Maybe a better way to phrase it is to say its currently 4th from the bottom, and if it does move up past Black Widow as I believe it will it'll be 5th from the bottom.
Thank you! Yes, the graphic helped
No one’s perfectI cannot count.
5th
With all the relatively creative Stitch marketing, I thought a more explicit ad could have been made to imply that Elio is basically Stitch’s fish out of water story in reverse, with the main character going to another world vs. an alien coming to ours. “If you liked L&S…”
That graphic is a little misleading unless it’s adjusted
Its based on actuals, which is how everyone tracks lists that show movie rankings within a franchise.
Yeah…but adjusted does reflect tickets sold/popularity more than straight numbers when you’re talking 15+ years
Except you're not extrapolating out such information like amount of tickets sold of one versus another, ie we're not getting that detailed in this forum. Plus not even to mention that overall ticket sales are down across the board over the last 15 years, so its a moot point anyways. Its a gimmick to try and make one movie look worse than another, and its why no one ever uses them in any real analysis of movie rankings. As inflation is always going to exist and a movie released years ago is always going to look better as time goes on compared to current movies. For example Gone with the Wind will always be the highest grossing movie of all time when adjusted for inflation. But in reality you would never say it did better than the likes of Avatar, Endgame, or Titanic, because that is just plain silly. Its why no one really ever uses them in such comparisons and why I've argued against their use here, but some still insist on using them.
I'm just not convinced it does. I've said before, but if I could have gone to this movie and gotten popcorn/drink with my one kid who wanted to see it for $25, I would have gone. But, neither of us cared that much to justify dropping $50 for it. So while ticket sales is a thing to watch, there is a very real other side of it where people just don't justify spending the insane costs on movies they would have 10 years ago (heck, maybe even 5 years ago).
In my opinion, the prices are out of control. Families cant afford to go multiple movies regularly. In my opinion, only dual income no kids can afford to walk up and go to every new movie they want to.
So do we think $350 million is the baseline expectation for an MCU movie at this point? Hulk was 17 years ago so it doesn’t feel particularly informative. That just leaves The Marvels under 350.
I think I mentioned it before, but $350M-$400M is a good baseline for the floor for MCU expectations in my opinion.
I don’t know if Ballerina is proof that action movie fatigue is there…. John Wick has never even been a 500 million franchise…There is only 1 that did over 400…and prequels never do as well as the franchise proper in which they spun from….Ballerina should of been released outside of summer…. With so much competition…. Not everything was going to hit…. And IMO…. I thought this was the biggest candidate from the get go
That's fair,
I agree with that…but it’s kinda different argument
We will see what happens…. I do expect How To Train Your Dragon to do well….Megan and 28 Years Later I am less sure…. Plus I am not sure if the former is of the horror genre…. I think Megan’s trailers has felt more action oriented ala Terminator 2