Back in the years people tell us we're supposed to forget about, because that's living in the past, get with the times, yadda yadda yadda.Where. Are. The. Pavilion. Logos. PLEASE.
Back in the years people tell us we're supposed to forget about, because that's living in the past, get with the times, yadda yadda yadda.Where. Are. The. Pavilion. Logos. PLEASE.
Doesn't look deep enough to be a planter, like Tron.So is the plan to fill the circle with dirt/landscaping? It's difficult to tell from the original concept art if that's what it is (or is it some otherwise solid surface other than concrete?).
Maybe some actual landscaping (like low-level shrubbery or flowers) would break up the inherent dullness of the plain white monolith dominating the bottom half of the sign...
View attachment 862425
![]()
most likely, not. they're not going to leave 200k of product sitting outside for gen pop to ruin. Guessing they'll still have their after show cars parked inside for looking at though.A lot of people are saying it feels like an old Epcot sign, but it’s 40 years later and we have a large ship on a pedestal outside of Guardians, which actually makes this change feel a bit too subtle. Unless…
View attachment 862397
Any chance those cars stay parked outside after the wall comes down? It looks ever so slightly badass and I bet it frames the sign really well.
I'd be absolutely shocked if there weren't vehicles parked inside for guests to look at when this re-opens.most likely, not. they're not going to leave 200k of product sitting outside for gen pop to ruin. Guessing they'll still have their after show cars parked inside for looking at though.
I'm positive the post show showroom will be similar to what it always has been. IIRC, going back to 1.0 there was always a Corvette on display after the ride exit. The showroom with CMs getting contact info for marketing purposes is probably the entire reason for the sponsorship.I'd be absolutely shocked if there weren't vehicles parked inside for guests to look at when this re-opens.
Nothing on the radar yet. I would be very surprised if there were not previews.@wdwmagic have you heard anything about guest previews, if they'll offer any like they did with TBA?
i remember mouse gear... same vein..Still really dislike the shop name. It's like Disney doesn't even like it the way they made it disappear like stealth camo into the patterned background.
i remember mouse gear... same vein..
Except it's not.
As stated already Mousegear was Disney-related goods.
Mouse = Disney and Gear = goods.
A shop that sells Disney merch.
"Gear Shop" on the otherhand implies nothing or at minimum the manufacturing of gears and sprockets. Though per that (same vein) definition:
Gear = Goods and Shop = Shop?
What the hell kind of creative name is that!? A shop that sells goods. How very clever.
Reversed, same outcome. Or perhaps they're implying that Shop is like a mechanic/autobody shop. Does that work any better? Nope.
They could do better.
I think you're discounting the fact that Imagineering is supposed to be the ones giving it thought so people on a forum aren't having to talk about it. Why bother giving an attraction a name?I think you're giving the name of a gift shop that literally 1% of WDW parkgoers is going to remember, or even care about, way too much thought. Most likely, they'll be scurrying through it as fast as possible so that their kids don't get a chance to grab a $35 'special edition' hot wheels that they could get at Walmart for $3.99.
Disney used to put effort into even that tiny 1%. And shop names are more memorable than you think.I think you're giving the name of a gift shop that literally 1% of WDW parkgoers is going to remember, or even care about, way too much thought. Most likely, they'll be scurrying through it as fast as possible so that their kids don't get a chance to grab a $35 'special edition' hot wheels that they could get at Walmart for $3.99.
How much say did Imagineering have in this ?I think your discounting the fact that Imagineering is supposed to be the one's giving it thought so people on a forum aren't having to talk about it. Why bother giving an attraction a name?
but what about the logo....Except it's not.
As stated already Mousegear was Disney-related goods.
Mouse = Disney and Gear = goods.
A shop that sells Disney merch.
"Gear Shop" on the otherhand implies nothing or at minimum the manufacturing of gears and sprockets. Though per that (same vein) definition:
Gear = Goods and Shop = Shop?
What the hell kind of creative name is that!? A shop that sells goods. How very clever.
Reversed, same outcome. Or perhaps they're implying that Shop is like a mechanic/autobody shop. Does that work any better? Nope.
They could do better.
What about the logo?but what about the logo.... View attachment 862502
Imagineering doesn’t give a crap what an insignificant tiny group of people on a forum talk about.I think your discounting the fact that Imagineering is supposed to be the one's giving it thought so people on a forum aren't having to talk about it. Why bother giving an attraction a name?
Which includes you and any opinion you give here...Imagineering doesn’t give a crap what an insignificant tiny group of people on a forum talk about.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.