I think they saw the hate online and wanted to explain their work.I get the vibe that no one in the marketing team or imagineering really love this idea but are stuck with it and trying to spin it as positively as possible.
I think it definitely did. Note the bridge by the mountain. You can even see hints of a boardwalk, just like the cartoon. The stream is so tiny, however, that it’s obscured by its surroundings.
I think the thing is that its clearly for children and 99% of children will like cars land more. So then its just disney vs people with nostalgia and they can't win that fight because change=bad to that crowd.We went last year and thought TSI was still pretty well maintained - simple animatronics were working, the guns all worked and made noise, etc
Now I think it is "dated" in not a modern attraction and definitely not ADA compliant, but it was in solid shape
Just trying to track the layout because I think it crosses over itself a few times.What does the colors mean?
Please. We have 3 years to analyze every pixel. By Christmas, we will be criticizing the river for not having enough fish pictured. Pretty sure I see a Sea Bass! Time for another WDI research trip so we get the correct species installed.Again, let's not over analyze concept art.
You aren't new here... we must freak out over everything!Again, let's not over analyze concept art.
Towards the bottom left corner of the original concept art, you can see a bridge crossing over what looks like a strip of water that divides the new Cars area from the rest of Frontierland.What bridge? The one with cars on it in the middle of the concept art? There absolutely is water there, but that's in the middle of the Cars area, not next to current Frontierland/Liberty Square. In front of CBJ there is only trees in the original concept art.
Please. We have 3 years to analyze every pixel. By Christmas, we will be criticizing the river for not having enough fish pictured. Pretty sure I see a Sea Bass! Time for another WDI research trip so we get the correct species installed.
The only way it wouldn't be accurate is if Disney was lying to media (possible) or if they scale back what they said (also possible). That said, it could be exactly what they're saying, and still not work. We'll have to see. I'm more optimistic but I'm still not sold.This whole post, if accurate and it pans out, does indeed alleviate a lot of concerns
It sounds stupid but I didn't even realize they're gonna be tearing down 50+ year old trees. Is there any way to save a tree that old, or is it impossible to move without killing it? I don't know much about moving trees, I know the Liberty Tree was moved when it was pretty mature but idk if that's a unique case or not.*Tears down totally normal trees that've been part of the park for over 50 years*
" It's gotta be based on animated films because that's just what you do in Magic Kingdom."
No, no it's not!
Our colons thanks to the crap we drank out of lead-lined decorative cupsWhat feels like “1971?”
I’d never heard the term before it came up in this thread. Wikipedia takes me to this:
![]()
Laurentian Mixed Forest Province - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
According to Jim Korkis, “The company wanted those bears to be from the North Woods to better fit into the theme of the North Woods of Bear Country, and later, Critter Country.”
WDW Chronicles: The Story Behind the Country Bears
by Jim Korkis Disney Historian Feature Article This article appeared in the November 20, 2012 Issue #687 of ALL EARS® (ISSN: 1533-0753) Editor's Note: This story/information was accurate when it was published. Please be sure to confirm all current rates, information and other details before...allears.net
I think people forget how fast and loose even the great Imagineers of the past played with the thematic logic of their creations. As long as something is well done, most people won’t mind if it doesn’t quite make sense.
Right? There is ZERO about the "country" bears that is like the Upper Midwest.
I wonder what will last longer. Over analyzing the barstools in GEO-82 or whether or not the color of the water in the cartoon art matches what the water color is in real life.
The dismissive passive-aggressiveness in these comments today is off the charts. Hard to believe that, for a while, this thread was getting kinda quiet and stale. Not anymore. The dusters, doomers, and everyone in between are fired up again.![]()
I think it definitely did. Note the bridge by the mountain. You can even see hints of a boardwalk, just like the cartoon. The stream is so tiny, however, that it’s obscured by its surroundings.
Mentioning the boardwalk, I think they might've implied it's staying? My notes are all based on what TC reported back, so when he said Disney said "the boardwalk would stay" I thought he just meant during construction to help with parade traffic flow. I guess there's a very real possibility that the construction will not touch the mainland side shore of the rivers, essentially just plopping it down on the island and then expanding the land a bit, making the river a little narrower.I think it definitely did. Note the bridge by the mountain. You can even see hints of a boardwalk, just like the cartoon. The stream is so tiny, however, that it’s obscured by its surroundings.
This will happen 30 years from never. There’s a big difference between a spinner and a lake with a riverboat.I'd like to see the Liberty Belle saved and moved to Adventureland to replace the Aladdin ride, as a restaurant or exploratory play experience. With an old tropical tramp steamer vibe it doesn't need to be kept pristine...
View attachment 862136
View attachment 862137
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.