Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
If Disney didn't "destroy and replace" and actually EXPAND, most folks would be fine with it.
What makes the "destroy and replace" feel even worse is that WDW does indeed have the blessing of size.
Of course when someone says, "blessing of size" some folks will say there is a lot of unusable land, yada, yada, yada.
Personally, I think "destroy and replace" is a cost savings thing; stop the need of maintenance of RoA, TSI and riverboat and reuse of existing space is cheaper than actually expanding the park and the additional tax if a park is expanded etc.
What makes the "destroy and replace" feel even worse is that WDW does indeed have the blessing of size.
Of course when someone says, "blessing of size" some folks will say there is a lot of unusable land, yada, yada, yada.
Personally, I think "destroy and replace" is a cost savings thing; stop the need of maintenance of RoA, TSI and riverboat and reuse of existing space is cheaper than actually expanding the park and the additional tax if a park is expanded etc.
Last edited: