Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
No…it’s not a “lie”The poster I originally quoted very clearly claimed they believed the $60 billion was a lie. Obviously priorities could change and plans could be altered, cut back, or expanded. But that doesn’t mean the original announcement was a lie.
Im not sure what point you’re trying to make with your second paragraph. Obviously individual projects could get cut or funding redirected. I was just pointing out (correctly) that they are bound to some spending commitments with certain government agreements.
It just has unlimited ways out.
What mono is saying is correct: “things change” covers everything
We do this thing here where we think that somehow the SEC will protect parks fans
Not on this planet
Again …I think they have to stop screwing around and get serious about parks investment
But it may not be until Bob is drug kicking and screaming from the building with his potted plant