I cannot see that at all. There is nothing in Disneys current catalog, even the worst of it imo, that belongs anywhere near a Six Flags. Disney has still been releasing cutting edge animatronics/effects that Six Flags would never try and Disney has not done any unthemed thrilling coasters etc. There is still a theme to each section/park even if that theme has slightly differed from the opening day theme.
I think it’s just a matter of finding a location for it and getting it approved. There are so many layers of management that these projects have to go through. It just may not be as high on the priority list as these other projects.
simple: it most likely has an exclusivity clause attached to it for the first few years of operation, so they legally wouldn't be able to for that period of time
You have to admit the ad for the ride was amazing for the time with that great voice actor and how he says Disney in it.
Even if they copied the land “exactly” as it exists in Shanghai there would still be extensive need for planning. You can’t just use the same plans and build it here.
But, for example isn't Galaxy Edge the same Layout on both East & West Batuu's?
It’s not exactly the same layout. But even if it was there would still need to be extensive planning and entirely new sets of plans.
I never said there haven’t been attractions cloned. I said that cloning would not mean there wouldn’t still be extensive need for planning. Even if they wanted to build an exact clone they would still need extensive planning and entirely new engineering drawings, plans, blueprints etc…
It’s not nonsense at all. It’s fact.
Yes, Galaxy’s Edge tried to do “design once, build twice” but that was planned and coordinated from the beginning. As much as possible they tried to meet California and Florida regulations at the same time, but even then they had to do some differences based on where it is impossible to harmonize the different codes. Then there were just some differences due to the different sites.
I'm saying the guests ultimately set the theme, not Joe Rohde. He just makes suggestions that the guests accept or reject.
I'm saying the guests ultimately set the theme, not Joe Rohde. He just makes suggestions that the guests accept or reject.
Rohde suggested restricting cute animals*, and the guests have rejected that.
This is not about what I want; I'm just reporting polls and such from outside this echo chamber.
EDIT: *Sorta
If you're talking the conversation over the past few days, the idea is simply that the guests have been expecting more of the cute animals in spite of Rohde's intentions, from what I can tell. Rohde's idea might have worked for a large land in a theme park, but apparently not for an entire Disney park, judging by Animal Kingdom's poor performance.