Tony the Tigger
Well-Known Member
Uh, spoiler alert.Both Rachel and Gal said in early interviews at D23 2022 that she wasn't going to be saved by the prince. I guess it's kind of still true cause the guy isn't a prince anymore.

Uh, spoiler alert.Both Rachel and Gal said in early interviews at D23 2022 that she wasn't going to be saved by the prince. I guess it's kind of still true cause the guy isn't a prince anymore.
It was not hyperbole. The world doesnāt end outside this site.To stateācalmly and in a manner befitting an adultāāI think her comments on the original movie are totally off baseā before elaborating on why.
Here are some direct quotations from this forum:
āShe's never been put in her place or had anyone teach her respect.ā
āPeople may be political about a snotty starlet who dissed the source material at company-sponsored media events.ā
āWhat audiences and fans will not accept is outright contempt for the original. That contempt oozes out of everything that has emerged from her.ā
āYea, what part of you donāt crap in the same exact spots you eat and sleep doesnāt this twit understandā¦?!?!?!ā
āBefore Disney sends Rachel Zegler out on the talk show circuit this winter, they need to give her media relations lessons from Halle Bailey. If not just perform a personality transplant.ā
āOn the other hand, āItās not 1937 anymoreā is a direct attack on the original film (and the people who love it).ā
āRachel Zegler said nothing new or bold or insightful. It's all so stale and predictable now. But somehow, and this is the magic of it all, she comes across to many as being this unlikable person. A real snot.ā
āBecause she's a snotty young person who just crapped on previous generations of artists who were far more accomplished than she is.ā
These are just some of the posts (most of them by men in their 40s or older) that, to my mind at least, represent a rather extreme reaction to what Zegler said. No film is worth getting that worked up over.
ETA: And yes, I will acknowledge that I myself was perhaps guilty of a bit of hyperbole in my earlier post. Only a small number of posters here have said things that are truly unhinged. But many have reacted in a manner that I consider disproportionate and/or unseemly.
I still can't get over that all they had to do was:
1. Cast seven human dwarf actors,
2. Stick as closely to the original animated film as possible, and
3. Not have the lead actress criticize the source material ...
... and this film would have printed money. But nope, they royally screwed it all up.
I feel youāre conflating wildly different things and sticking them all under the umbrella of contempt. Perhaps youāre correct in your assessment, but it all seems a bit too cynical to me.Zegler was at a Disney event, speaking to Disney approved media, hyping her Disney movie project. A lead actress selling a film is definitionally speaking for Disney. One of the jobs of leading in a major movie is selling that major movie. The fact that Disney did not prepare her for these questions is nuts. Disney owns every part of a film. Its conceptual stage, filming, and ultimate release including media tours. That is all part of what it means to be a Hollywood star and a Hollywood studio.
It's possible that Zegler's views really were isolated and just her own. Perhaps everyone working on the modern Snow White adaptation, except Zegler, loves Snow White and appreciates the legacy they were dealing with. I find that unlikely though. Her making fun of the original signaled a deeper contempt that seemed to hang over the project.
Bob Iger's Disney raises prices at the theme parks while not even delivering functioning effects in return. I was just at Walt Disney World and Cosmic Rewind was the only E-Ticket in full working order. Every other E-Ticket is either desperately in need of refurbishment or had key effects broken. Charging what they do while not delivering on the basics signals contempt to me. Why shouldn't Disney have the same contempt for their cinema goers as well?
I myself am a man in his 40s. Itās not a question of having opinions, but of expressing them in a manner in keeping with our age and maturity.Wait a second ... are you saying men in their 40s (or older!) had opinions?!?! Did anyone tell them that we don't accept opinions from men in their 40s (or older!)?
Yeah, thatās not what this 40-something-year-old man was saying. At all.Yes, that line gave away the game. It translated to: This laundry list of opinions should be discounted because they are largely offered from old men, and old men are problematic and should be ignored.
And wasn't white.Many of those same men (and others) made disparaging remarks about Halle Bailey. She also had the temerity to star in a Disney movie that showed women as less dependent on men.
Aspect | Details |
Response to Backlash | Addressed in October 2024 Variety interview, clarified love story remains integral, explained Snow Whiteās name tied to resilience. |
Previous Comments Criticized | Criticized original love story as āweirdā due to stalking, focused on leadership, admitted watching original once and finding it scary (Extra TV, Variety). |
Impact on āSnow Whiteā | Backlash led to most disliked trailer on YouTube, reduced box office projections ($45ā55M opening), mixed reviews (47% Rotten Tomatoes, 47/100 Metacritic). |
Previous Statements on Backlash | In 2023 on X, hoped āevery child knows they can be a princess no matter whatā (https://x.com/rachelzegler/status/1680225020772057088). |
Surely a Musk-developed AI tool wouldn't have negative things to say!!Just for fun.. Here is a Grok 3 deep dive into the questionā¦
Did Rachel Zieglerās comments have negative effect on Snow White?
Key Points
Background
- It seems likely that Rachel Zieglerās comments had a negative effect on the Snow White movie, based on public backlash and mixed reviews.
- Her remarks about the original story sparked controversy, affecting perception and possibly box office performance.
- The movie received mixed critical reception, with some praising her performance despite the controversies.
Rachel Ziegler, starring as Snow White in the 2025 live-action remake, made comments in 2022 criticizing aspects of the 1937 animated film, such as the portrayal of Prince Charming and the focus on the love story. These remarks, including calling the prince a āstalkerā and stating the remake would not center on romance, led to significant online backlash. The controversy was amplified by her admission of only watching the original once as a child and finding it scary, which some fans interpreted as disrespecting the classic.
Impact on Reception
The backlash likely contributed to a negative public perception, with the teaser trailer becoming the most disliked on YouTube, receiving nearly one million dislikes. Advance ticket sales were lackluster, with opening weekend projections dropping from $63ā70 million to $45ā55 million. The Hollywood premiere on March 15, 2025, had no traditional red-carpet press, possibly due to the controversies. Despite this, critical reviews were mixed, with Rotten Tomatoes showing 47% positive reviews and Metacritic scoring it 47/100, indicating āmixed or averageā reception. Some critics praised Zieglerās performance and the filmās new musical numbers, calling it one of Disneyās better remakes.
Unexpected Detail: Mixed Critical Praise
Despite the controversies, some reviews highlighted Zieglerās charisma and the filmās enchanting visuals, suggesting that the movie still resonated with parts of the audience, offering a silver lining amidst the backlash.
Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Rachel Zieglerās Comments and Their Impact on Snow White
Rachel Zieglerās comments about the original 1937 āSnow Whiteā film and the upcoming live-action remake have been a focal point of controversy, significantly influencing the movieās public perception and reception. This analysis delves into the specifics of her statements, the ensuing backlash, and their effects on the filmās critical and commercial performance, based on recent discussions on message boards, film reviews, and articles as of March 20, 2025.
Context of Zieglerās Comments
In 2022, during interviews at the D23 Expo, Ziegler made several remarks that sparked debate. She criticized the original filmās love story, stating, āThereās a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her. Weird! Weird! So, we didnāt do that this time,ā as noted in an Extra TV interview. She also mentioned that the remake would focus on Snow White dreaming of becoming a leader rather than being saved by the prince, saying, āItās no longer 1937. Snow White wonāt be saved by the prince or dream of true love; sheāll dream of becoming a leader, as her late father told her to be fearless, fair, brave, and true,ā from a Variety interview. Additionally, in an Entertainment Weekly interview, she confessed, āI was scared of the original version. I think I watched it once and never picked it up again. Iām being so serious,ā revealing she revisited it only after being cast.
These comments were perceived by some as dismissive of the original film, leading to significant backlash. For instance, an X post by Vara_Dark stated, āRachel Zegler admitting she didnāt like Snow White growing up, saying she had only watched it ONCE before getting the role is so sad to me. Out of MILLIONS of women who loved the character, care about the story and yet this is who we get.ā Another X post by EndWokeness called her a āwalking PR disaster for Disney,ā highlighting the intensity of the reaction.
Public and Social Media Backlash
The backlash was not limited to her comments but extended to broader issues, including her casting as a Latina actress in a role traditionally depicted as white, and changes to the story, such as the reimagining of the Seven Dwarfs. Social media platforms like TikTok and X saw viral criticism, with users like CosyWithAngie (9.5M views) and ShikaLord (3M likes) discussing how her remarks altered Snow Whiteās character, viewing it as antifeminist or reducing diversity in portrayal. Some defenders, like Franchesca Ramsey on TikTok (https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8N5nth2/), argued the backlash was unjustified, comparing it to male actors like Harrison Ford and Robert Pattinson who criticized their franchises without similar hate.
The controversy also included racist remarks, with Ziegler facing backlash for her ethnicity, as reported by NBC News. This added another layer to the discourse, with Ziegler addressing it in 2023 on X, stating, āI donāt want to be tagged in nonsensical discourse about my casting. I hope every child knows they can be a princess no matter whatā (https://x.com/rachelzegler/status/1680225020772057088).
Impact on Film Reception and Box Office
The negative reaction to Zieglerās comments contributed to a challenging pre-release environment for the film. The teaser trailer, released in August 2024, became the most disliked film trailer on YouTube, with nearly one million dislikes and over 82,000 likes within three weeks, as reported by NME and MovieWeb. This unprecedented dislike ratio underscored the publicās discontent, likely influenced by the controversies.
Box office projections, initially estimated at $63ā70 million for the opening weekend, were revised down to $45ā55 million by February 2025, as noted by Deadline and Variety. Compared to the $69.4 million opening of āMaleficentā (2014), this suggests a potential impact on commercial performance. The Hollywood premiere on March 15, 2025, at the El Capitan Theatre had no regular red-carpet press, a decision likely influenced by the controversies, as reported by Variety and Hollywood Reporter.
Critical Reception
Despite the pre-release controversies, the filmās critical reception, as of its release on March 21, 2025, has been mixed. Rotten Tomatoes reported 47% positive reviews from 98 critics, with an average rating of 5.5/10, while Metacritic assigned a score of 47 out of 100 based on 39 critics, indicating āmixed or averageā reviews. Positive reviews, such as from IndieWire, praised it as āgood, spirited and sweet,ā highlighting Zieglerās performance and new musical numbers. Variety called her a āshining supernova,ā and Newsweek noted critics like Christopher Rates It on X describing it as āa decent live-action remakeā with āmagicalā performances.
However, negative reviews, such as from The Guardian, criticized the CGI and called the trailer āhauntingly bad,ā reflecting ongoing discontent. Wikipedia noted that David Hand, son of the co-director of the 1937 film, described the remake as āinsulting,ā adding to the polarized reception.
Zieglerās Response and Mitigation Efforts
Ziegler addressed the backlash in an October 2024 Variety interview, stating, āIt made me sad that it was taken in such a way [ā¦] It can be very upsetting when things get taken out of context or jokes donāt land.ā She clarified in a USA Today article that the love story remains integral, countering claims it was removed, and explained Snow Whiteās name in the film as tied to surviving a snowstorm, emphasizing resilience. She also retweeted fan posts on X, like darkfandom_, showing her enjoyment of the role, and liked posts defending her, such as by nyssasorchid, as a way to mitigate the negative discourse.
Comparative Context and Broader Implications
The backlash against Ziegler was compared to other Disney princess castings, such as Halle Bailey as Ariel in āThe Little Mermaidā (2019), which also faced racist remarks, as noted by USA Today. Some argued on platforms like Quora (https://www.quora.com/Are-you-surprised-by-the-backlash-against-Rachel-Zeglers-comments-about-Snow-White) that the reaction was part of āWoke Warsā discourse, typical for Disney remakes. The controversy also prompted The Daily Wire to announce a competing adaptation, āSnow White and the Evil Queen,ā though no updates followed after Brett Cooperās departure in December 2024, as per Wikipedia.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Rachel Zieglerās comments significantly contributed to a negative effect on the Snow White movie, amplifying controversies around casting, story changes, and public perception. This is evidenced by social media backlash, the most disliked trailer on YouTube, reduced box office projections, and a muted premiere. However, the filmās mixed critical reception, with some praising Zieglerās performance, suggests that while the comments impacted perception, they did not universally define the movieās artistic merit. This complex interplay highlights the challenges of reimagining classic stories in a polarized cultural landscape.
Key Citations
Aspect DetailsResponse to Backlash
Addressed in October 2024 Variety interview, clarified love story remains integral, explained Snow Whiteās name tied to resilience.
Previous Comments Criticized
Criticized original love story as āweirdā due to stalking, focused on leadership, admitted watching original once and finding it scary (Extra TV, Variety).
Impact on āSnow Whiteā
Backlash led to most disliked trailer on YouTube, reduced box office projections ($45ā55M opening), mixed reviews (47% Rotten Tomatoes, 47/100 Metacritic).
Previous Statements on Backlash
In 2023 on X, hoped āevery child knows they can be a princess no matter whatā (https://x.com/rachelzegler/status/1680225020772057088).
- Rachel Zeglerās āSnow Whiteā Comments Are Being Compared To Robert Pattinsonās Open Hatred For āTwilightā
- Rachel Zegler stirs viral backlash after comments resurface about āSnow Whiteā remake
- Rachel Zegler addresses backlash to controversial āSnow Whiteā comments: āIt made me sadā
- Snow White (2025 film) - Wikipedia
- Disneyās Snow White | Rotten Tomatoes
- āSnow Whiteā 2025 Review: Live-Action Remake Is Sweet and Song-Filled
- āSnow Whiteā Movie Reviews Are in After Disneyās Woke Controversy
- āSnow Whiteā First Reactions: Rachel Zegler Praised for Live-Action Remake
- Latina āSnow Whiteā actor Rachel Zegler responds to racist remarks
- Rachel Zegler Snow White Backlash Romeo and Juliet Gaza
Loved Cruellaā¦. This is the one sequel I wantā¦. Emma Stone was great as the titular characterprobably why Cruella is still my favorite remake by far, it was a completely new story yet felt familar
Yeah that guy isnāt too smart. Did you see the astronautās returning to Earth the other day?Surely a Musk-developed AI tool wouldn't have negative things to say!!![]()
![]()
That is an excellent observation. So I asked Sam Altmanās ChatGPT 4.5 to do a deep dive on same questionā¦. This is very long and detailedā¦Surely a Musk-developed AI tool wouldn't have negative things to say!!![]()
![]()
God those opening paragraphs are horrific. Not that anyone reads NYT anymore, but the text is exactly why people aren't seeing the film and what is wrong with hollywood and its supporters.Review of Snow from NYT
Keep in mind people actually think he evilly sits there going 'yes, yes! The AI will only use the moat evil of sources for its text mwahahhahaaa'Yeah that guy isnāt too smart. Did you see the astronautās returning to Earth the other day?
Thatās all simple stuff.
What takes real intelligence is setting cars on fire.
Yes.. get your butts in the theater. Need to make my 600 million prediction come true.Who gives a cr@p what AI returns about this. Go to the movie or not for your own individual reasons.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.