Is it enough? At least one of the cancelled attractions was cancelled because they decided it wasn't a good idea, not because they couldn't afford it. Another was supposedly just postponed to a second phase, but has ended up in limbo as far as I'm aware. Whether or not that could be considered "value engineering" is debatable, but I also think it's largely irrelevant, as people here are mostly criticizing what was actually built based on observations from aerials, as if they know for certain it was supposed to look different (read: more expensive.) Can you give other, specific examples of the park being made less ambitious?