• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

brideck

Well-Known Member
Now can we agree that Brody is an insufferable d!nk that nobody likes and that’s 100% on him?

Ha. Honestly, I generally like him as an actor. He has such a distinct look that it would be hard to necessarily believe him in some roles, but his first stretch of post-Oscar movies was good stuff in my book -- Hollywoodland, The Village, The Brothers Bloom, etc.

As a person? No real idea. I don't pay much mind to folks, but I just assume that I wouldn't really enjoy being around very many celebrities from any field at all. Moreso, I'm not really sure what I'd get personally out of having such strong negative feelings about some of them, but it seems to be a popular pastime.

I was surprised that the producers and orchestra went along with extending his time -- apparently it's now the longest Oscars acceptance speech in history. It was like 90% subtext without really saying anything concrete -- overly careful and a bit amusing to watch.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Ha. Honestly, I generally like him as an actor. He has such a distinct look that it would be hard to necessarily believe him in some roles, but his first stretch of post-Oscar movies was good stuff in my book -- Hollywoodland, The Village, The Brothers Bloom, etc.

As a person? No real idea. I don't pay much mind to folks, but I just assume that I wouldn't really enjoy being around very many celebrities from any field at all. Moreso, I'm not really sure what I'd get personally out of having such strong negative feelings about some of them, but it seems to be a popular pastime.

I was surprised that the producers and orchestra went along with extending his time -- apparently it's now the longest Oscars acceptance speech in history. It was like 90% subtext without really saying anything concrete -- overly careful and a bit amusing to watch.
It was awful

He came off as a self righteous A-hole

Getting snippy and lamenting negative Pr he created…I’m surprised Halle berry didn’t have her bodyguard kneecap him just on principal

…and speaking of…my god…she’s almost 60…like fine wine
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
I was surprised that the producers and orchestra went along with extending his time -- apparently it's now the longest Oscars acceptance speech in history. It was like 90% subtext without really saying anything concrete -- overly careful and a bit amusing to watch.
Yeah, missed opportunity. If you’re going to stall the music, you’d better have your thoughts together.

This is why we have screenwriters! 🤣😉
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
I think "Mother Earth and Father Time" would have been a nicer In Memoriam song, both as a tribute to Richard Sherman who was included in the montage, and because its simple sentimentality would have been more tonally appropriate IMO.
 

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Flow winning best animated feature is kinda wild when you realize it was made with open-source software by a small team of artists. I still haven’t seen it but heard good things. Amazing that it beat Pixar and Universal entries. Really goes to show how much the Academy voting body has changed in the last ten years.
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
Flow winning best animated feature is kinda wild when you realize it was made with open-source software by a small team of artists. I still haven’t seen it but heard good things. Amazing that it beat Pixar and Universal entries. Really goes to show how much the Academy voting body has changed in the last ten years.
I heard that the Academy hates the people who worked on the Disney Renaissance, which is why Musker and Clements never won the award, why Musker wasn't nominated for his short film (and Andreas Deja as well) and why Menken is never nominated anymore. Maybe that's the reason why they didn't want to give the award to Chris Sanders.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
I heard that the Academy hates the people who worked on the Disney Renaissance, which is why Musker and Clements never won the award, why Musker wasn't nominated for his short film (and Andreas Deja as well) and why Menken is never nominated anymore. Maybe that's the reason why they didn't want to give the award to Chris Sanders.
Source?
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
And what’ll end up happening once TPs generation no longer tunes in is that they’ll go back to not televising it like they did the first 25 years of its existence.

That line cracked me up more than it should have. 🤣

I had to go to untrustworthy Google to look up how many TV sets there were in the 1930's and 40's. (I'm old, but I wasn't there.)

The first Academy Awards ceremony was held in Hollywood in 1929. There were no commercially available TV's.

The first large scale exhibit of Television was made at the 1939 New York World's Fair. But World War II put it all on hold.

After World War II ended, in 1946 there were approximately 10,000 TV sets in the USA.

The Academy Awards was televised for the first time in March, 1953. Prices for 12 inch TV sets were dropping fast by then. 1953 was the same year that half of American households had a TV set!

This isn’t a night for the public to celebrate films, it’s a night for Hollywood to celebrate themselves and their films. It always has been that way, and always will be no matter who watches or doesn’t watch the broadcast.

It actually hasn't always been that way.

In 1975, 48.1 Million Americans watched the Oscars. That was 23% of the US population of 216 Million that year.

Fifty years later...

In 2024, 19.5 Million Americans watched the Oscars. That was 6% of the US population of 340 Million that year.

Doing that math actually surprised me. I can sense the Oscars are on the cusp of cultural irrelevancy, but I hadn't realized how low it had dropped as a percentage of the US population. That's incredible to see, really. :oops:
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
In 1975, 48.1 Million Americans watched the Oscars. That was 23% of the US population of 216 Million that year.

Fifty years later...

In 2024, 19.5 Million Americans watched the Oscars. That was 6% of the US population of 340 Million that year.

Doing that math actually surprised me. I can sense the Oscars are on the cusp of cultural irrelevancy, but I hadn't realized how low it had dropped as a percentage of the US population. That's incredible to see, really. :oops:

More math-related questions for you:

How many TV channels were there in 1975?

How many are there now? (I'll cut you some slack and not even ask you to include all of the non-TV ways that people watch video entertainment today.)

How many people tuned in back in 1975 due to lack of other options, but didn't really care about them?

How many people care today, but don't actually watch the broadcast, instead watching via snippets posted to various social media platforms?
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
More math-related questions for you:

How many TV channels were there in 1975?

How many are there now? (I'll cut you some slack and not even ask you to include all of the non-TV ways that people watch video entertainment today.)

How many people tuned in back in 1975 due to lack of other options, but didn't really care about them?

How many people care today, but don't actually watch the broadcast, instead watching via snippets posted to various social media platforms?
In 1975 you had 2 through 13 and a couple of UHF channels from the antenna or a hand full more if you were rich enough to afford cable and there was nothing on to watch.

Fast forward to today, thousands of choose from and there is still nothing on to watch ;)
 
Last edited:

TP2000

Well-Known Member
More math-related questions for you:

How many TV channels were there in 1975?

How many are there now? (I'll cut you some slack and not even ask you to include all of the non-TV ways that people watch video entertainment today.)

How many people tuned in back in 1975 due to lack of other options, but didn't really care about them?

How many people care today, but don't actually watch the broadcast, instead watching via snippets posted to various social media platforms?

While we await the official viewership numbers from last night's Oscars telecast on ABC.... You can answer the question of the cultural relevancy of the Oscars, and it's crashing viewership in the past 15 years, by comparing it to other TV events that were as big, or bigger, than the Oscars. Using our 50 year timeframe again:

In 1975, 48.1 Million people watched the Oscars. That was 23% of the US population at that time.
In 1975, 56.0 Million people watched the Super Bowl. That was 26% of the US population at that time.

In 2024, 19.5 Million people watched the Oscars. That was 6% of the US population at that time.
In 2025, 127.7 Million people watched the Super Bowl. That was 38% of the US population at that time.

In 1975 the Super Bowl was only 8 years old, and the Oscars were 46 years old.

Technology has changed greatly since 1975, but the cultural relevancy and impact of the Oscars has crashed in the last 15 years. And trust me when I tell you that in the last few decades of the 20th century, the Oscars viewing parties in the homes of confirmed bachelors were epic! 🥳🍸🤩
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Since hardly any of us probably saw Anora, and it wasn't mentioned here at all really the past four months, here is the Box Office performance for that Best Picture winner.

What Was Your Name Again.jpg


Doing the box office math on that gives us this profit for this arthouse film by Neon studios:

Anora: Production $6 Million, Marketing $3 Million, Domestic $10, Overseas $9 = $10 Million Profit
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Since hardly any of us probably saw Anora, and it wasn't mentioned here at all really the past four months, here is the Box Office performance for that Best Picture winner.

View attachment 847016

Doing the box office math on that gives us this profit for this arthouse film by Neon studios:

Anora: Production $6 Million, Marketing $3 Million, Domestic $10, Overseas $9 = $10 Million Profit
6M is the catering budget on a typical Disney movie. ;)
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Flow winning best animated feature is kinda wild when you realize it was made with open-source software by a small team of artists. I still haven’t seen it but heard good things. Amazing that it beat Pixar and Universal entries. Really goes to show how much the Academy voting body has changed in the last ten years.
I saw Flow in the theaters. It's wonderful movie with a lot of heart. It makes me want to replay Stray. It was definitely the best choice for an Oscar followed by Wild Robot.
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
While we await the official viewership numbers from last night's Oscars telecast on ABC.... You can answer the question of the cultural relevancy of the Oscars, and it's crashing viewership in the past 15 years, by comparing it to other TV events that were as big, or bigger, than the Oscars. Using our 50 year timeframe again:

In 1975, 48.1 Million people watched the Oscars. That was 23% of the US population at that time.
In 1975, 56.0 Million people watched the Super Bowl. That was 26% of the US population at that time.

In 2024, 19.5 Million people watched the Oscars. That was 6% of the US population at that time.
In 2025, 127.7 Million people watched the Super Bowl. That was 38% of the US population at that time.

Congratulations! You've discovered the one television event that has managed to maintain/grow its audience over the last 50 years. The fact that it's tantamount to a religion in this country may have something to do with its status as an extreme outlier.

Technology has changed greatly since 1975, but the cultural relevancy and impact of the Oscars has crashed in the last 15 years. And trust me when I tell you that in the last few decades of the 20th century, the Oscars viewing parties in the homes of confirmed bachelors were epic! 🥳🍸🤩

I'm not trying to argue that the Oscars have less cultural relevancy now than they did 50 years ago, but that the same is true for nearly every single thing that one could name that has lasted for that long. Moreover, because of technology, TV ratings are a terrible way to measure that relevancy. Judging from your posting history, the people younger than you show interest in things and consume information about them in ways that you're only barely aware of, if at all.
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
I saw Flow in the theaters. It's wonderful movie with a lot of heart. It makes me want to replay Stray. It was definitely the best choice for an Oscar followed by Wild Robot.

Agreed. And I thought all of the animated nominations were fine, though this year's installment of Wallace & Gromit was pretty weak for me.
 

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Since hardly any of us probably saw Anora, and it wasn't mentioned here at all really the past four months, here is the Box Office performance for that Best Picture winner.

View attachment 847016

Doing the box office math on that gives us this profit for this arthouse film by Neon studios:

Anora: Production $6 Million, Marketing $3 Million, Domestic $10, Overseas $9 = $10 Million Profit
Next do the box office numbers for CODA, Best Pic winner of 2022.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom