But Indiana Jones has been involved with Animal Kingdom since 1996
His mom took him there when he was a young boy
A removed attractions park would easily be my favorite park.Great. Now I won't get to experience Dinosaur/ Dinoland USA on my my first WDW trip either. First Great Movie Ride, Maelstrom, Splash Mountain, Horizons, the original Journey into Imagination, World of Motion and now this.
Because they are planning to remove an “animal” themed section in “animal” kingdom to put in some fantasyland stuff with greenery so they can both check off a box and call it themed to animal kingdomBut humans have. It's part of the basic conceit of Animal Kingdom: it's a place for humans to understand animals.
I seem to remember long ago Rohde explaining that Dinoland exists as an examination of how humans understood/perceived Dinosaurs and by extension other animals, despite never actually living or seeing them face to face. If you can accept that humans and dinosaurs can share a relationship that never actually existed face-to-face.... why is it such a stretch to believe that other fictional characters could too?
You literally have no idea what the attraction will be about, and we're talking about a movie where one character has the power to commune with all the fauna of South America and another the power to control all the flora. Maybe wait until the ride doesn't cover those topics to complain.Because they are planning to remove an “animal” themed section in “animal” kingdom to put in some fantasyland stuff with greenery so they can both check off a box and call it themed to animal kingdom
It's why I haven't gone back. Those rides are what made WDW different. Now they all are about flashy with some thrill.Great. Now I won't get to experience Dinosaur/ Dinoland USA on my my first WDW trip either. First Great Movie Ride, Maelstrom, Splash Mountain, Horizons, the original Journey into Imagination, World of Motion and now this.
A removed attractions park would easily be my favorite park.
and you also have no idea what the attraction will be about or what it will or won’t cover. Regardless, forcing Encanto into a park called animal kingdom while completely removing any dinosaur themed area of that park to me is backwards theming, like forcing Tiana in FrontierlandYou literally have no idea what the attraction will be about, and we're talking about a movie where one character has the power to commune with all the fauna of South America and another the power to control all the flora. Maybe wait until the ride doesn't cover those topics to complain.
Because they are planning to remove an “animal” themed section in “animal” kingdom to put in some fantasyland stuff with greenery so they can both check off a box and call it themed to animal kingdom
To be fair, todays fans don't care about any of that. They want their IP and flashy attractionsand you also have no idea what the attraction will be about or what it will or won’t cover. Regardless, forcing Encanto into a park called animal kingdom while completely removing any dinosaur themed area of that park to me is backwards theming, like forcing Tiana in Frontierland
It's why I haven't gone back. Those rides are what made WDW different. Now they all are about flashy with some thrill.
To be fair, todays fans don't care about any of that. They want their IP and flashy attractions
The point is that there is a completely straightforward way to tackle the environment and animals of the tropical Americas using Encanto as a vehicle. They won’t have to twist themselves in knots to do it; the answer is right there.and you also have no idea what the attraction will be about or what it will or won’t cover. Regardless, forcing Encanto into a park called animal kingdom while completely removing any dinosaur themed area of that park to me is backwards theming, like forcing Tiana in Frontierland
I said fantasyland…like mermaid rides which might be what we getNow I agree!
Bring back the realistic attraction that featured time travel and smuggling a Dinosaur back to modern day in a jeep.
Enough of the fantasy stuff.
As long as there aren't mermaids...Which I don't know why there would be given the IPs...I said fantasyland…like mermaid rides which might be what we get
Why? So far none of the new attractions have appealed to me at all. Tron and Guardians may be fun but they don't compete with Velocicoaster, Hagrids, Top Thrill 2 or Steel Vengeance.Maybe you should go back before judging attractions and us who attend.
Velocicoaster, Hagrids, Top Thrill 2 or Steel VengeanceWhy? So far none of the new attractions have appealed to me at all. Tron and Guardians may be fun but they don't compete with Velocicoaster, Hagrids, Top Thrill 2 or Steel Vengeance.
These rumored additions coming to the parks don't fit the theme of the parks. Just more extension of Magic Kingdom
I could not care less about Encanto. I just don’t see why it’s difficult to acknowledge that a film that takes place in the tropical Americas with characters who control regional animals and plants might be a fairly straightforward add to a tropical Americas-themed area of Animal Kingdom.Surprised how many cheerleaders there are for Encanto. Bruno would be pleased (if I’m allowed to talk about him in here).
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.