matt9112
Well-Known Member
I can’t help but just continue to feel cost and implantation aside….this much planning shouldn’t be remotely necessary to enjoy a trip.
It really hammers home the lack of capacity compared to attendance the parks face.
Edit- I think my point is validated by disney itself guardians and rat both don’t have nearly the same problems as other new rides have at other parks…. Epcot isn’t straining under capacity problems (on paper I mean) the other three parks with MGM being the worst are likely considerably under capacity related to attendance.
I don’t mean to beat a dead horse but I feel like people smarter than me could graph attendance with capacity and find some kind of sweet spot for guest experiences. Including shows each park probably has a solid number you could come to for how many guests can do anything at any given time. A ridership for the entire park if you will. Honestly although harder to calculate restaurants and stores also likely contribute as those technically are capacity just not attraction capacity. If I’m eating in a restaurant I am not in line anywhere. The restaurant is still overall park capacity.
Stores are likely more convoluted however in a similar vein they MUST play a factor. Epcot is proof. That park does not have attraction capacity that is unusually high or different from the other parks yet it doesn’t seem to bend to the same issues as the other three parks. (In this vein frozen is likely an outlier as the only “kiddie” ride in showcase for how many years?)
This tells me that Epcots massive abundance of stores and restaurants absolutely plays into a parks capacity.
Furthermore I would argue this solidifys the need for functional fleshed out lands or expansions and not the (,capacity wise) abomination that is galaxy’s edge. Galaxy’s edge has to be one of the most wasteful land utilization ratios resort wide.
As an example of the type of changes that would actually help a park-
magic kingdom probably in our “fantasy land” needs a massively wider Main Street filled with stores twice as large and deep as well as more dining. As much as I critique tron it is a net gain however it will likely result in more attendance gain than it actually adds in capacity and thus makes our ratio worse.
The problems the parks are facing cannot be fixed easily or without massive cap x and tearing down and redoing integrally important pieces of the parks. Things like closing entire lands arguably needs to occur. To allow entire redesigns.
Or we can just raise prices at a steeper gradient than ever before and hope we lower attendance to whatever that sweet spot i aforementioned is.
It really hammers home the lack of capacity compared to attendance the parks face.
Edit- I think my point is validated by disney itself guardians and rat both don’t have nearly the same problems as other new rides have at other parks…. Epcot isn’t straining under capacity problems (on paper I mean) the other three parks with MGM being the worst are likely considerably under capacity related to attendance.
I don’t mean to beat a dead horse but I feel like people smarter than me could graph attendance with capacity and find some kind of sweet spot for guest experiences. Including shows each park probably has a solid number you could come to for how many guests can do anything at any given time. A ridership for the entire park if you will. Honestly although harder to calculate restaurants and stores also likely contribute as those technically are capacity just not attraction capacity. If I’m eating in a restaurant I am not in line anywhere. The restaurant is still overall park capacity.
Stores are likely more convoluted however in a similar vein they MUST play a factor. Epcot is proof. That park does not have attraction capacity that is unusually high or different from the other parks yet it doesn’t seem to bend to the same issues as the other three parks. (In this vein frozen is likely an outlier as the only “kiddie” ride in showcase for how many years?)
This tells me that Epcots massive abundance of stores and restaurants absolutely plays into a parks capacity.
Furthermore I would argue this solidifys the need for functional fleshed out lands or expansions and not the (,capacity wise) abomination that is galaxy’s edge. Galaxy’s edge has to be one of the most wasteful land utilization ratios resort wide.
As an example of the type of changes that would actually help a park-
magic kingdom probably in our “fantasy land” needs a massively wider Main Street filled with stores twice as large and deep as well as more dining. As much as I critique tron it is a net gain however it will likely result in more attendance gain than it actually adds in capacity and thus makes our ratio worse.
The problems the parks are facing cannot be fixed easily or without massive cap x and tearing down and redoing integrally important pieces of the parks. Things like closing entire lands arguably needs to occur. To allow entire redesigns.
Or we can just raise prices at a steeper gradient than ever before and hope we lower attendance to whatever that sweet spot i aforementioned is.
Last edited: