Ldno
Well-Known Member
In the case of DLR vs. WDW, DLR has roughly the same number of attractions in two parks that WDW has spread across four.
Going from FP 1.0 to Maxpass was glorious IMHO, I could stack passes and ride other rides in between
but for sure this is why I love DLR, all those rides in a short amount of space versus WDW
.
I don’t know, I get more bang for my buck that way, this is was I low key hated FP+
Maxpass is similar to how Fastpass 1.0 was in WDW, in turn it was possible to ride all rides better than FP+, it worked, too good I think.When you're spending a day in a park, that leaves a LOT more options open to DLR guests than those at WDW... and that's not even considering how many more guests WDW sees in a day vs DLR.
It's more people spread across more space with actually far less to do per park.
That's the problem in a nutshell - WDW is dramatically under-built when it comes to desirable capacity vs. guest count and their emphasis on replacing rather than expanding when they have room to do both in all parks* only makes things worse when most replacements have shorter ride-times than what they were replacing.
*The only one where that is a bit tricky is Hollywood Studios - you know, the one where they most recently built an expansive land with only two attractions - and even there, they have options.
Going from FP 1.0 to Maxpass was glorious IMHO, I could stack passes and ride other rides in between


I don’t know, I get more bang for my buck that way, this is was I low key hated FP+
