The headquarters of the Jungle Navigation Co., from which you depart, is in Africa.I figured when you talk about Africa you are reffering to the Jungle Cruise...which never made sense to me. First of all when your in the cave you come across a tiger...Tigers are NOT found in Africa!
Because its better when the theme works as a whole, without jarring transitions and intrusions.also why does Adventureland...have to be one theme??? The theme is Adventure much like Walts old TV shows taking you all over the world.
I guess you are one of a very few....I think the Area flows well.
I never knew that! interesting. But still the ride works!The headquarters of the Jungle Navigation Co., from which you depart, is in Africa.
From there you sort of cross the globe via river.
No...I Think some people on here over think areas and designs and nitpick way too muchI guess you are one of a very few....
Lack of "nitpicking" is what leads to things like DinoRama, 'toons in Tomorrowland, and Nemo in Epcot.No...I Think some people on here over think areas and designs and nitpick way too much
I agree some nitpicking is fine like everything you just mentioned I AGREE WITH! I hate dinorama, Toons and nemo in epcot. However adventureland theme is not oneof them. thats allLack of "nitpicking" is what leads to things like DinoRama, 'toons in Tomorrowland, and Nemo in Epcot.
There needs to be more nitpicking in my opinion...
30s India you mean. The Jungle Navigation Company and the Temple of the Forbidden Eye are located in India.True, but it is near the front, close to Tiki Room. That provides a subtle progression from Tiki to a small Arabia, then into the main 1930s Africa part of the land.
30s India you mean. The Jungle Navigation Company and the Temple of the Forbidden Eye are located in India.
Really? I need to go back and read the manual...30s India you mean. The Jungle Navigation Company and the Temple of the Forbidden Eye are located in India.
Since we're discussing Theme Park Theory, an interesting test of the type of integration I mentioned will be with the new Tangled bathrooms. On one side you'll have the rigid, Euro-historical gingerbread architecture designed by WED in the late 60s and across from it you'll have the more sagging, aged, storybook style employed by WDI in the more recent era. How will they be woven together and/or will there be an attempt to do so? Is there a need?
I bring up this issue in my post here:
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/...thirty-years-apart.856749/page-2#post-5271027
Funny how nitpicking done right is celebrated as a detail, part of the "Disney Difference," but when not done well it should just be ignored.Lack of "nitpicking" is what leads to things like DinoRama, 'toons in Tomorrowland, and Nemo in Epcot.
There needs to be more nitpicking in my opinion...
I feel as if in 50 years WDW will be one giant game, without any rides.
Sometimes attractions do have to be shoehorned in to make use of space that wasn't drawing crowds. And if you say it's crowded then some people must like it.
I don't think it will take anywhere near that long. They are turning the place into Disneyland Kinnect.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.