rsoxguy
Well-Known Member
I can only guess you guys have got great restaurants at home,saying that we've only been going since 2004 but love the variety of cuisines available and yet to have a real bad meal.:wave:
My first day back on the Forum after illness and travels, and an interesting topic is staring me in the face. I believe that the dining plan should the way of the dinosaur. I think that it has crowded the restaurants and cheapened the dining experience within the parks. I realize that full restaurants are a wonderful thing for Disney, but bottom-line profits don't always yield long-term benefits for a company. When your reputation for pleasant dining experiences is gone, it's gone.
As to our Scottish friend's inquiry, allow me to answer with a non-Disney example. I eat at McDonald's from time to time. I do not think that their food is a culinary treat, but for the price and quick service it is acceptable. It is particularly good when I go as a dollar menunaire. If, however, McDonald's began charging eight dollars for a lowly cheeseburger, it would only serve to highlight the mediocre quality of the food when compared to the exorbitant pricing. I sometimes wonder why I'm there if the drive-through line takes more than five minutes. Why? Because cheap food is never worth a wait.
The food choices at Disney can at times be considered "good". The thing that makes them "mediocre" is the fact that the meals are overpriced, and we are made to feel that it is a privilege to get reservations for a meal at a Canadian restaurant serving food that can be found on any street corner restaurant for half the price. I wouldn't be prone to complain about tepid, dry burgers at Pecos Bill's if they cost four dollars with a side of fries. Alas, the dining plan has helped to make Disney Dining a chore rather than a pleasure. Remember, these are solely the opinions of rsoxguy, and the Red Sox organization can not be held responsible for their content.