Part of me thinks Disney's endgame is to have 7500 people in a park on a given day, with each of those spending $1,000 for entry. I'm kidding of course, but maybe........
But the hours would only be 10-2 so you'd still need a VIP guide to do anything.Part of me thinks Disney's endgame is to have 7500 people in a park on a given day, with each of those spending $1,000 for entry. I'm kidding of course, but maybe........
I already paid for my USAP, and have every year of my life since I started working... I get the American Citizen discount, too.Anyone is welcome to enter the United States with the new USAP*.
Platinum, access to the US every day of the year. $2,000 per guest.
Gold, access to the US most days of the year. $1,500 per guest.
Silver, access to the US some days of the year. $1,000 per guest.
*Blockout dates may apply.
FTFYPart of me thinks Disney's endgame is to have 77,500 people in a park on a given day, with each of those spending $1,000 for entry. I'm kidding of course, but maybe........
You are probably correct.Oh please. I was there in 1957, and 1960 and mare after that. Don’t fool yourself. He sold as much merchandise throughout the park as he could. He even sold cells from his films on Main Street. I’ve got one in my living room that i’m looking right now that I got in 1960. He sold hats, mugs, Davy Crockett merchandise, anything he could. Walt was a tough determined business man who created an Uncle Walt persona that helped sell the park through his Disneyland show. If you want to learn about Walt the business do some research about that hard nosed negotiations he was in the middle of to build Disneyland (it wasn’t just Roy). And read about how he treated employees who tried to start a union. It will change your mind.
People have got to get over this myth of him just being a nice guy wanting to build a park for people’s enjoyment. That may have been part of it but the tough, determined businessman that learned a lesson from losing Oswald was a major component of who he was.
Also remember the age difference, lol remember the old adage of parents about how things change when it's your doughYou are probably correct.
Even though I've been going to WDW since 1971, it just seems to me that the profit objective continues to be more obvious and more the main focus with every passing year. And I agree with UNCGolf that it's not just a Disney thing. I guess I'm to blame too because I like it when my 401(K) and Portfolio balances continue to grow. Maybe I am deluding myself into believing there was a more altruistic time in our world, long ago. Maybe not. I'm all for capitalism, at least compared to alternatives, but the "greed is good" mentality (thanks Gordon) is still difficult to swallow sometimes.
Thanks for the reality check.
Also remember the age difference, lol remember the old adage of parents about how things change when it's your dough
1971 almost 50 years ago you might not have been concerned about if Disney was getting greedy.
I don't mind Disney raising it's price because I do think the public will let them know real quick if they think it's too much. I'd rather that then some artificial regulations in order to make it "affordable".
Not at all but I do believe in a business having the freedom to operate as it seems best. The reason why I don't mind is because I have confidence in the consumer. Consumers have a ton of power, if they don't like something or they don't feel they are getting their monies worth they will stop supporting a business. Think about how you shop. Do you remember when coke tried to reformulate their soda and market it as new coke?? What happened, the public said forget that and Coco cola quickly back peddled.Granted, I haven't been on the boards very long but it seems to me that you champion these price hikes at every turn. I agree that until things change, them prices will rise. But to sit back and applaud it saying you don't mind? It's baffling. Almost like you want to give away more of your money.
I know right....God forbid we discuss something on a forum...........you know the sole purpose, discussion.Perhaps there are new members to the forum that would like to share their opinions?
Disney’s a very special place for many people and many will do almost anything to get there and the Disney company taking advantage of it. I’d rather them hold out on the fancy gadgets in these rides and attractions we have lived so long without and still enjoyed the parks just as much maybe even more. I’m going to Epcot, the crowds at the Magic Kingdom aren’t worth it to me but it’s a shame that others have to give up on something they have loved for so long not to mention sold itself. it would be a shame if the parks turned into a getaway for the rich and rich only. For what I see it the board is milking the parks and stock until they bail leaving Disney bankrupt. Educate me if I’m wrong that’s how I see it I know nothing about the market but I really should.
Will these prices ever cap out? Short answer, No. Not at all defending Disney, but their costs of doing business keep going up, and as a public company their FIRST responsibility is to their shareholders, so the must keeping making more and more money and the only thing they can do is to pass the costs on to the customer.
A company's fiduciary duty to the shareholders has nothing to do with increasing quarterly revenue; you could actually make an argument that such prioritization is actually a violation of their fiduciary duty depending on long-term effects.
That sentence is some theoretical silly-string. Corporate fiduciary duty is a nebulous, cloudy area where absolutes go to die. Stating it has 'nothing to do with increasing quarterly revenue' is just........no. The rest of the argument, though meant in good faith, just falls apart after that.
What negative long-term effects can be tied to increasing quarterly revenues that can't also be attributed to management/maintenance of the world's most popular 50 year-old theme park? Record attendance again means a record number of people canaffordfind a way to spend money on the product they are producing.
That sentence is some theoretical silly-string. Corporate fiduciary duty is a nebulous, cloudy area where absolutes go to die. Stating it has 'nothing to do with increasing quarterly revenue' is just........no. The rest of the argument, though meant in good faith, just falls apart after that.
What negative long-term effects can be tied to increasing quarterly revenues that can't also be attributed to management/maintenance of the world's most popular 50 year-old theme park? Record attendance again means a record number of people can afford the product they are producing.
For some reason my original post got deleted so I am reposting.I'd rather that then some artificial regulations in order to make it "affordable".
For some reason my original post got deleted so I am reposting.
No one ever suggested this. This is the most straw of strawmen. Patently ridiculous.
Parking at MK was 50 cents ---now 25 bucksAdmission price in 1971 was 3.50. Allowing for inflation it would be 20.00 today. Your either rich or you saved for years to go.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.