Genie_naughty_whispers
Well-Known Member
How about a 5th gate before they shell out money for a new location
Just for the sake of argument - what are the average temps in Texas (as well as the highs and lows) vs Anaheim and Orlando?
Whenever I talk to someone who lives in Texas, all I hear is how hot it is and how hardly anyone goes outside....please correct me if I am wrong.
I could be completely wrong, but unless Disney believes building a third park closer to the east coast (but west of the Mississippi) could help with the whole no-Avengers in WDW problem, I highly doubt we'll see a third resort any time soon. But, for the sake of forum conversation, let's say it was on the table. To me, Texas seems like it is just way too extreme, both in terms of temperatures and storms, to build a year-round Disney park. Though, I will admit I am personally bias towards a more northern option if such a thing were ever a possibility.
Texas has very pleasant weather most of the year. It starts to get warm in June through September, but if you're in North Texas the Dallas/Fort Worth area it's not humid. It is hot, 90's to just over 100, but again not humid. And it doesn't rain a whole lot in Texas.
Texas has very pleasant weather most of the year. It starts to get warm in June through September, but if you're in North Texas the Dallas/Fort Worth area it's not humid. It is hot, 90's to just over 100, but again not humid. And it doesn't rain a whole lot in Texas.
Those regions, though, experience significantly milder winters than the Niagara Falls area. I don't think Marineland sits directly in line of the lake effect "snow machine" that regularly buries Buffalo, but the Niagara Falls-Fort Erie corridor still receives far more annual snow fall than Tokyo and Marne-la-Vallée. Even without snow, Niagara Falls can be bitingly cold in the winter (I lived just to the north of there for a few years).Not sure about Texas, but I'm 100% in favor of turning Marineland in Naigara Falls into a park owned by Disney, Universal or Busch.
The park is 1,000 acres in size, double the size of the Disneyland Resort and about 4x the size of Epcot. Unlike many other potential sites, this land is already an amusement park and the city's mayor supports it staying that way. It would be a shame if it just became another casino or housing development. Niagara Falls isn't going to stop being a tourist attraction and with the park on the Canadian side it would be seen as a less expensive alternative for those in Ontario or the North Eastern US. With Tokyo and Paris Disneylands, the company now has experience designing and operating parks in winter climates. Other brands like Great Wolf Lodge have built indoor waterparks in the area, but there's little doubt in my mind Disney or Universal could do better.
Marineland has been marred in controversy for years, and the park has never lived up to its potential due to funding issues. The original owner died last year and he was the main reason it was never sold off. IMO, now's the time to make it something better.
In my personal opinion, it's too hot for anyone not from Texas or the Deep South. Both Dallas and San Antonio have top monthly temps that are nearly 5+ degrees higher than Orlando which itself can be downright unbearable at times. Granted, humidity plays a huge role in Florida but, still, in climate terms, 5 degrees is a big jump. Texas is also part of the heart of tornado alley and hail is way worse than rain.
You reminded me of the summer I spent at Fort Sam for OBC. If I really wanted to get a good run on my own, it was well after 10 PM before the temperature was safe to even attempt it.Humidity plays a part when the sun is up, but it can also make for cooler mornings and evenings. That doesn't happen with dry heat. It's just HOT all the time. Like 100 degrees at 11pm hot.
Would like to see it happen in order to relieve the crowds at WDW but it will never happen
Not sure about Texas, but I'm 100% in favor of turning Marineland in Naigara Falls into a park owned by Disney, Universal or Busch.
The park is 1,000 acres in size, double the size of the Disneyland Resort and about 4x the size of Epcot. Unlike many other potential sites, this land is already an amusement park and the city's mayor supports it staying that way. It would be a shame if it just became another casino or housing development. Niagara Falls isn't going to stop being a tourist attraction and with the park on the Canadian side it would be seen as a less expensive alternative for those in Ontario or the North Eastern US. With Tokyo and Paris Disneylands, the company now has experience designing and operating parks in winter climates. Other brands like Great Wolf Lodge have built indoor waterparks in the area, but there's little doubt in my mind Disney or Universal could do better.
Marineland has been marred in controversy for years, and the park has never lived up to its potential due to funding issues. The original owner died last year and he was the main reason it was never sold off. IMO, now's the time to make it something better.
To introduce another point, LA and Orlando are year-round tourist destinations. Texas, while popular in its own right, is just not in the same league.
Florida in general, though, has been a significant tourist destination since the early 20th century.Keep in mind that Orland was not a big city by any stretch before Disney moved in.. The population basically doubled from the 50s to the 70s, and has kept growing by nearly 30% a decade since.
View attachment 417369
Yes it is and does but all of Texas weather is not suitable for a park that is open 365 days a year, all the climates have extemes and A.D.D. weather. And most places where there is enough land for such a park are not even remotely near any airports (Im talking 2 or 3 hour drives or more). Texas is just in no way going to work.Texas is very big and has a very wide variety of climates within the state. I’m sure Disney would not have a problem finding a place for a Disney Resort.
With this said, I don’t think we will ever see this. I believe Disney is having enough problem with the parks they have.
Yes it is and does but all of Texas weather is not suitable for a park that is open 365 days a year, all the climates have extemes and A.D.D. weather.
Haha, our ranches are West of DFW and the weather is inconsistent. Some summers it'll be in the 110's from July till September, while some winters it'll be like artic tundra since the only thing blocking the wind are three strands of bar wire. Killer hail the size of baseballs, tornados, and grassland fires.
Nope, no Disney parks. Heck Six Flags over Texas gets flooded out regularly.
Busch is no longer in the theme park business. After the InBev buyout, the parks operation was sold off and now does business as SeaWorld Entertainment.Not sure about Texas, but I'm 100% in favor of turning Marineland in Naigara Falls into a park owned by Disney, Universal or Busch.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.