Reply to thread

Did I miss something?  Why would Disney "lie" about a building being unsafe?  Isn't it Disney's right (or any business owner's) to decide to replace an attraction (or service) that is dropping in popularity with one that will generate more revenue? Isn't it far more expensive to demolish a building and rebuild a new one (with whatever attraction), than to use an existing building and just change the attraction inside?  If it is more expensive, why demolish it if they didn't have to?  You're making it sound like Disney is conspiring to do nothing but tick people off.  I find it hard to believe they have have cast members assigned to the "tick off department"!