Ah yes THAT video. I never understood why said Belle wasn't a "real" princess because she married into it, but Cinderella is standing RIGHT THERE. :ROFLOL:
Anyways, I ultimatley don't care who is considered a princess and who isn't, heck wikipedia lists Mulan and Pocahontas as "officially" part of the franchise
Belle might not be a Princess in the litteral sense but she is in the Disney Princess Line (A registered trademark of the Walt Disney Company)Ah yes THAT video. I never understood why said Belle wasn't a "real" princess because she married into it, but Cinderella is standing RIGHT THERE.
They could rip out Toontown.
Belle might not be a Princess in the litteral sense but she is in the Disney Princess Line (A registered trademark of the Walt Disney Company)
:sohappy:Unfortunately.
I'm just a little bit jealous of WDW. :lookaroun
Why!? They actually have a cool one, over there...They could rip out Toontown.
Indeed! WOOT!I don't know what DL could or might do.
All I know is, it's going to be great having the best MK style park in the world -
IN LAKE BUENA VISTA!
Well thats just it, she IS a princess in the literal sense. She married the Beast, who was a PRINCE before he became cursed. Cinderella also was a commoner before marrying a prince.
As long as they either
a)start out a Princess, or
B) Marry a Prince,
...they are considered a princess.
HEEY..I just thought of something.....that technically means Nancy from Enchanted is a Princess, cause she marries Edward at the end! And Ironically, her last name is TREMAINE. :lookaroun
I know, I know. This feeling sucks. :lol::sohappy:
HAH! Now you know what it feels like!:drevil::lookaroun
Hee hee.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.