What the heck is Dinoland U.S.A?

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
There are a few reasons why a lot of Disney fans hate dinoland. One of them being when Walt was designing Disneyland and WDW he did not want them to feel like a “cheap carnival”-that’s exactly what dinoland is. Another is because it perfectly represents what Eisner turned the Disney parks into, creative but really cheap and tacky looking.

Our Themelord and Savior, Uncle Walt, installed his fair share of 'flats.'
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
I definitely have no issue with flats, I just don’t like when WDI act like flats are anything more than they are.
But they've never been consistent with this either. On Dumbo you are riding on Dumbo, but King Arthur Carousel is just a carousel.

At Dinorama, the two rides are literally just carnival rides. In Toy Story Land, Alien Swirling Saucers and Slinky Dog Dash are toy model kits of rides.
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
Yeah, this whole "flat rides are too cheap to be in Disney parks" complaint is weird because they've been there all along.
Indeed I went to Magic Kingdom in both Florida and California (in that order) when they were the only parks.
Tea Cups, Dumbo, Speedway, the much worshiped Mr. Toad...
 

Movielover

Well-Known Member
Forgive my ignorance, but can someone define "flat ride" to me?

It usually pertains to any ride that doesn't have a "track" like a rollercoaster or darkride, however some darkrides that are small enough could be considered "flat rides" such as traviling fair Haunted Houses.

It also has nothing to do with the height of the ride since many "flat rides" can be quite tall.

So for example The Astro Orbiter in MK is a flat ride as oppose to The Little Mermaid dark ride, even though the Astro Orbiter is higher and has a greater elevation change in its ride program.
 

HongKongFu

Well-Known Member
Our Themelord and Savior, Uncle Walt, installed his fair share of 'flats.'


Yeah, this whole "flat rides are too cheap to be in Disney parks" complaint is weird because they've been there all along.


Lazy.

So if parks gave us unconvincing show scenes in 1963 it's ok to continue that in the 2000's even though architectural designs and engineering has greatly improved over the years.
 

HongKongFu

Well-Known Member
2 is better than 0, no? And where is it written that that is the only option to enhance such a ride.

I think we are just going to go round and round on this topic so I'm getting off when the music stops playing.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom