Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
So, which part of the fake news theory am I part of? The defending of correct information or supporting fake news. I'm not the one that is taking a very short time of experience in being able to know what is down and what isn't and implying that for some reason there are more down times then in the past? I'm the one making that assumption? Hell, he could be right, I don't know and neither does he. What my point has been is, OK, one day there were 12 attractions over 4 parks that he felt were major draw attractions that had downtime. No reference about how long it was, no knowledge of why is was down for that time and just a snide implication that things are really bad there and apparently nothing has been done to correct it. Implying that mechanical things just don't break down. Spreading that belief that might or might not influence the attitudes that other guest might have. OK, then I'll be the anti-fake news person. What the heck, everyone accepts negative as fact these days anyway. Let's continue that trend. I never said it was a conspiracy, in fact it is a much to prevalent way of life now. Let's point out things that have no basis of fact and make a big deal about it.Goofy is part of the fake news theory. A plot derived by an innocent tourist to take down Disney. Why would davis0042 lie?
The entire point was that until very recently there was no way of knowing without actually standing right there, what was broken and what wasn't. For all any of us know, there might have been 12 rides down in just one park at some point. We don't have that information. So to use it as a observation point that it never happened before (in the good old days) is not based on fact. It is based on lack of knowledge combined with the other fake news that things were so much better back in the day.
Last edited: