Shaman Well-Known Member Apr 14, 2005 #41 Here I thought the removal of the facade had something to do with the whole press event...allow easier access into the theater....maybe?...no? I thought the picture wasn't too bad...the colors were a bit off though...
Here I thought the removal of the facade had something to do with the whole press event...allow easier access into the theater....maybe?...no? I thought the picture wasn't too bad...the colors were a bit off though...
adr315 Member Apr 14, 2005 #43 i never understood the golden gate bridge in that "set"... its out of proportion, and doensn't belong AT ALL where it is....
i never understood the golden gate bridge in that "set"... its out of proportion, and doensn't belong AT ALL where it is....
BRER STITCH Well-Known Member Apr 14, 2005 #44 Thanx for the pics SPECK! :wave: That's the only way I could really get an idea about what was good or bad about the SF backdrop. It looks fine to me in the pics you posted. Maybe they've decided to feature the Golden Gate Bridge more, like at California Adventure! It's cool how you can walk right under it there! Time will tell!
Thanx for the pics SPECK! :wave: That's the only way I could really get an idea about what was good or bad about the SF backdrop. It looks fine to me in the pics you posted. Maybe they've decided to feature the Golden Gate Bridge more, like at California Adventure! It's cool how you can walk right under it there! Time will tell!
captainbuzzy Active Member Apr 14, 2005 #45 I though it looked pretty bad when I was there a maonth ago. Glad they are trying again. It would be cool if they opened up some shops in the buildings on NY street and give the place a sense of action instead of the static display that it is.
I though it looked pretty bad when I was there a maonth ago. Glad they are trying again. It would be cool if they opened up some shops in the buildings on NY street and give the place a sense of action instead of the static display that it is.