Totally get it! Tons of work went into building this in the past, but that’s what the old threads are for. You don’t see a front facing revision history on a wiki article. It’s just really not easy to read and frankly about 5% of the rumors on there are active, which is really quite difficult to figure out. I have to click every source to find out it’s something Martin said in 2017… so it’s really not relevant.
The harder option, if everyone prefers the current format with way more information, would be to date the rumors in the source link I.e. [here - 2017]
I am naturally quite grateful to the effort put into these threads, absolutely not a criticism of anyone who has put past or current effort into the trackers. Just a suggestion acknowledging I’m not the one doing the work!