Updates to the Seas Pavilion

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Bad ride is bad whether it has IP (Nemo) or not (Superstar). And Nemo is a bad ride. It is a book report ride that gets the book all wrong. The Nemo ride is to Nemo as what the current Figment ride is to Figment: an unenjoyable disaster.

It's no wonder that both rides are so often a walk-on.

How do you compare them to voyage of the little mermaid? I think both are better then voyage, but of course that’s not saying much.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
How do you compare them to voyage of the little mermaid? I think both are better then voyage, but of course that’s not saying much.

Voyage is just as bad. The interactive screens in the queue are too high for children... on a children's ride. And they're useless now that there isn't a long queue (because no one want to go on the ride again), so, everyone just walks past them.

The story of the book report is highly condensed into no real narrative that you can follow unless you're already familiar with the movie... but let's get a lot of annoying Scuttle in there to not really fill in the blanks.

Too many people excuse the poor use of AAs just because there's the one decent AA of Ariel dancing. In that scene, you have fish on sticks rotating back and forth and even more plastic unarticulated ones just glued to the wall. It's a Small World has more life and movement and joy than that scene, which is heartbreaking for fans of the movie and fans of dark rides.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Voyage is just as bad. The interactive screens in the queue are too high for children... on a children's ride. And they're useless now that there isn't a long queue (because no one want to go on the ride again), so, everyone just walks past them.

The story of the book report is highly condensed into no real narrative that you can follow unless you're already familiar with the movie... but let's get a lot of annoying Scuttle in there to not really fill in the blanks.

Too many people excuse the poor use of AAs just because there's the one decent AA of Ariel dancing. In that scene, you have fish on sticks rotating back and forth and even more plastic unarticulated ones just glued to the wall. It's a Small World has more life and movement and joy than that scene, which is heartbreaking for fans of the movie and fans of dark rides.

The AAs (or lack thereof) in Voyage are atrocious. The whole thing looks incredibly cheap; it's an embarrassment to Disney. That movie deserves much better.

I still think it's a better ride than Nemo, but that's mainly because it has more space to build something like the Under the Sea scene and Nemo was constrained by trying to shove it into a space that was never intended for anything more than views into the aquarium. The Under the Sea scene still looks cheap (the fish on sticks, as you mentioned... ugh), but at least it's more visually impressive from size/space alone.

I would love to see Voyage completely rebuilt from scratch into something worthy of Disney. They could shut down and rework Winnie the Pooh while they're at it.

I can't compare it to Imagination because I haven't been on that ride since like 2004 or something. I know it's very bad, but I can't bring myself to go into that once incredible pavilion again just to view a rotting corpse.
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
They certainly did. The entire EAC projection corridor used to have windows on both sides of and above the ride path.
For me, the tunnel changes were the most confusing part about the Nemo overlay. Why block the great views just to project cartoon turtles onto plywood? Of course we know the clamshells don’t rotate like a true omnimover, but the top and side tunnel windows could have remained. It made less sense than ripping out the Hydrolators (which I miss too).
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
I wonder why the Nemo ride didn’t use more of the views into the aquarium... I’m thinking of the underwater props they used in the subs in California.
It was renovated during the time WDI was replacing AAs and props with projections, and most of the DL sub props were left over from the previous submarine voyage.
 

Prototype82

Well-Known Member
Nemo is a "cute" ride, but that's about it. The only "wow" moment is seeing the characters projected over the glass, and even that's underutilized. The new signage is a great step in the right direction, but as of now, everything is still painted in overwhelmingly similar shades of blue. Gut it and paint the inside white and clean. Imagine a new interactive experience that would draw kids and families into the center of the Sea Base. Something interactive and engaging with some wow factor would be a great use of the IP IMO.
 

steve2wdw

WDW Fan Since 1973
The whole Nemo overlay to the SeaCabs was a missed opportunity. Instead of spending 5 minutes looking for Nemo, we should have had 5 minutes of Edu-tainment. Imagine Mr Ray (and the rest of the Nemo gang) giving us fun facts about "the seas" and the importance of protecting them. That whole section of the pavilion, in it's current state, is just fluff, no substance.
 

Prototype82

Well-Known Member
I still want more colors then 5 shades of blue. It makes it looks so boring inside. Some orange and gray would add a bit to it. At least the new signs have orange logos to break up the color...just slightly.
I missed this comment before I said the same thing. I agree, orange and gray would look really clean!
 

trainplane3

Well-Known Member
I missed this comment before I said the same thing. I agree, orange and gray would look really clean!
I mean...I'm just reminiscing about the original style but it really made it feel like you were in some kind of technological marvel:
seabase_alpha6_20131028_2039516043.jpg

vs
22849620787_84a68705b2_b.jpg

All of the blues are just so boring. Everything just looks flat (and even dreary in person) now whereas before the paint added depth to the flat surfaces (am I making any sense?). I get that they want to make it "fun" looking but surely you can do better then buying all shades of blue.
 

ThatMouse

Well-Known Member
The whole Nemo overlay to the SeaCabs was a missed opportunity. Instead of spending 5 minutes looking for Nemo, we should have had 5 minutes of Edu-tainment. Imagine Mr Ray (and the rest of the Nemo gang) giving us fun facts about "the seas" and the importance of protecting them. That whole section of the pavilion, in it's current state, is just fluff, no substance.

Great idea, "Come join us now and see <list of all the creatures housed here>" and yes the importance of why we have aquariums and like have a point to this what once was the largest aquarium on the planet!
 

FigmentJedi

Well-Known Member
I mean...I'm just reminiscing about the original style but it really made it feel like you were in some kind of technological marvel:
seabase_alpha6_20131028_2039516043.jpg

vs
22849620787_84a68705b2_b.jpg

All of the blues are just so boring. Everything just looks flat (and even dreary in person) now whereas before the paint added depth to the flat surfaces (am I making any sense?). I get that they want to make it "fun" looking but surely you can do better then buying all shades of blue.
They should have kept that orange and white color scheme, syncs with Nemo perfectly.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
Voyage is just as bad. The interactive screens in the queue are too high for children... on a children's ride. And they're useless now that there isn't a long queue (because no one want to go on the ride again), so, everyone just walks past them.

The story of the book report is highly condensed into no real narrative that you can follow unless you're already familiar with the movie... but let's get a lot of annoying Scuttle in there to not really fill in the blanks.

Too many people excuse the poor use of AAs just because there's the one decent AA of Ariel dancing. In that scene, you have fish on sticks rotating back and forth and even more plastic unarticulated ones just glued to the wall. It's a Small World has more life and movement and joy than that scene, which is heartbreaking for fans of the movie and fans of dark rides.
The AAs (or lack thereof) in Voyage are atrocious. The whole thing looks incredibly cheap; it's an embarrassment to Disney. That movie deserves much better.

I still think it's a better ride than Nemo, but that's mainly because it has more space to build something like the Under the Sea scene and Nemo was constrained by trying to shove it into a space that was never intended for anything more than views into the aquarium. The Under the Sea scene still looks cheap (the fish on sticks, as you mentioned... ugh), but at least it's more visually impressive from size/space alone.

I would love to see Voyage completely rebuilt from scratch into something worthy of Disney. They could shut down and rework Winnie the Pooh while they're at it.

I can't compare it to Imagination because I haven't been on that ride since like 2004 or something. I know it's very bad, but I can't bring myself to go into that once incredible pavilion again just to view a rotting corpse.
I don't under the Mermaid hate when Peter Pan is a much worse attraction.
 

General Mayhem

Well-Known Member
And they're useless now that there isn't a long queue (because no one want to go on the ride again), so, everyone just walks past them.
As a passholder who visits on a practically weekly basis, this is not true. Journey of the Little Mermaid (bc remember Voyage is at DHS) tends to gather quite the crowd on a daily basis reaching 60 minutes again on a weekly basis. Every time I've gone through the queue all sorts of people interact with the screens... just not in the right way. Instead of pointing at the crabs to take away items, they just wave at them. Some of you fans need to stop acting like your opinion dictates what the general public enjoys/does.
 

General Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Also I'd take Journey of the Little Mermaid over The Seas with Nemo and Friends (ride not pavilion) any day. Not only because I'm heavily biased towards The Little Mermaid as an IP. But because almost the entirety of Nemo is just screens with all of the characters literally screaming and shouting at you about finding Nemo. Ashman/Menken songs literally cannot be topped and certainly not by that.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
As a passholder who visits on a practically weekly basis, this is not true. Journey of the Little Mermaid (bc remember Voyage is at DHS) tends to gather quite the crowd on a daily basis reaching 60 minutes again on a weekly basis. Every time I've gone through the queue all sorts of people interact with the screens... just not in the right way. Instead of pointing at the crabs to take away items, they just wave at them. Some of you fans need to stop acting like your opinion dictates what the general public enjoys/does.


You're right, meant "Under the Sea: Journey of the Little Mermaid."

But, 60 minutes usually, eh?...

1580446789533.png
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I don't under the Mermaid hate when Peter Pan is a much worse attraction.

Peter Pan gets a pass because it was innovative when it came out. And it's in such a tiny space that there isn't much that could replace it. And nostalgia.

The newer, bigger, more recent rides should have been much better.

I should say that I never ride it unless it's a walk on at the end of a MK After Hours event.
 

Nunu

Wanderluster
Premium Member
I'd do Mermaid only if standy is at 30mins or less. I like the exterior, the queue and the beginning of the ride, when you've boarded the clamshell and go "under water". From there, the quality of the ride goes downhill for me.

It occupies a large space, I wouldn't have minded for it to be smaller, but done well. What a missed opportunity!
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom