crispy
Well-Known Member
I was thinking Harry Potter and the Rise of the Resistance. Not to be punny, but this looks epic!!Harry Potter and the Tower of Terror (don't get me wrong, I'm ALL for this! Looks incredible!)
Last edited:
I was thinking Harry Potter and the Rise of the Resistance. Not to be punny, but this looks epic!!Harry Potter and the Tower of Terror (don't get me wrong, I'm ALL for this! Looks incredible!)
Toy Story Land?Lets be clear - if Disney announced a new land where two of the primary selling points were something in another park at WDW, the tears would be endless.
It’s not trackless. I believe they considered it, looked at Rise’s lack of reliability, and then decided to go a different direction.I was thinking Harry Potter and the Rose of the Resistance. Not to be punny, but this looks epic!!
I’m not really sure what this means? The selling point is clearly the battle for the ministry attraction no?Lets be clear - if Disney announced a new land where two of the primary selling points were something in another park at WDW, the tears would be endless.
The first two things they talk about are a wand shop and butterbeer.I’m not really sure what this means? The selling point is clearly the battle for the ministry attraction no?
What exactly did TSL add that is in another WDW park?Toy Story Land?
That ride vehicle is straight up ToT/MB lol. Do we know if there's a drop component? Or how this ride vehicle even moves around?
Excited for the ride. The land itself feels underwhelming and not especially magical, outside of the rad fireplace entrance. And only 1 ride? Bummer
But it’s the excitement for the future because the scope and experiences of the original two lands were so wonderful! Hogsmeade and Diagon are so fleshed out and full of amazing thematic elements. Butterbear and wands are just a part of a highly detailed world.Lets be clear - if Disney announced a new land where two of the primary selling points were something in another park at WDW, the tears would be endless.
I assume they got Imelda back to play Umbridge but anyone else will just be stock footage? Kind of hard to do a ride still focused on Harry Potter after the actors have aged out and/or moved on.
If Disney stuck a second Savi's in another park, you'd all cry about it. And Savi's is a FAR better experience than the wand shop.But it’s the excitement for the future because the scope and experiences of the original two lands were so wonderful! Hogsmeade and Diagon are so fleshed out and full of amazing thematic elements. Butterbear and wands are just a part of a highly detailed world.
WDW could build an additional Toy Story land over in MK and it wouldn’t be all that exciting to many because of the average original land at DHS. Same with Pandora- trees, greenery, and rock work and we never get to see it after dark anymore.
Depends if that new Savi’s was surrounded by a land focused on the Original Trilogy.If Disney stuck a second Savi's in another park, you'd all cry about it. And Savi's is a FAR better experience than the wand shop.
I assure you people are clamoring for a Ministry of Magic full scale area. Sure, FB doesn’t hit the same spot but the land is gonna do well just on the ministry.Yeah, I am so excited for this theme park but the video of the new HP land just does not hit the same. I bet if they had a time machine they would not have themed the new land to Fantastic beasts at all. Aren't they set before Potter? So how are you going into the flu network and then seeing Umbridge? I don't know it just looks...meh. People want to be transported into the world of Harry Potter but I am not sure that FB is a world people are really clamoring to visit, if most even know it at all.
I, and I’m sure many others, prefer the wand shop to Savi’s. Why? I have experienced the wand shop, as it isn’t paywalled. I have never visited Savi’s and probably never will. The wand shop is beloved because it is easier to experience.If Disney stuck a second Savi's in another park, you'd all cry about it. And Savi's is a FAR better experience than the wand shop.
This is the worst reasoning I've ever seen in my life.I, and I’m sure many others, prefer the wand shop to Savi’s. Why? I have experienced the wand shop, as it isn’t paywalled. I have never visited Savi’s and probably never will. The wand shop is beloved because it is easier to experience.
Well, in this case, the new shop is surrounded by a land focused on movies that even the most ardent Potter fans can't enjoy.Depends if that new Savi’s was surrounded by a land focused on the Original Trilogy.
And yet what they built looks to follow nothing regarding those films actual plot which was the biggest complaint about them. The main ride jumps to the time period people actually care about. In other words, Universal has a better feel for what Potter fans want than Disney has with Star Wars fans.Well, in this case, the new shop is surrounded by a land focused on movies that even the most ardent Potter fans can't enjoy.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.