EricsBiscuit
Well-Known Member
Starfall Racers is the first new non IP E ticket at Uni or Disney in Orlando in a very long time. Very impressive.
Starfall Racers is the first new non IP E ticket at Uni or Disney in Orlando in a very long time. Very impressive.
Is it really an "E" tho?Starfall Racers is the first new non IP E ticket at Uni or Disney in Orlando in a very long time. Very impressive.
It’s an E. I feel like historically high thrill rides have been E, animatronics/heavy theming or not. Do we count Tron as an E?Is it really an "E" tho?
Will there be a queue superbly themed that tells a story?
Will it be really obvious that "Hey, this is a roller coaster!"
And apparently, the make and break criterion for some people (not me, tho)... will it have AAs?
It’s an E. I feel like historically high thrill rides have been E, animatronics/heavy theming or not. Do we count Tron as an E?
Nothing in Florida beats Velocicoaster's roll over the lagoonI foresee:
Starfall bests Hulk and Velocicoaster on straight thrills
As for theme Starfall is equal to or better than Velocicoaster but nowhere in the league of a Hagrid.
Yes, we call it an E level attraction
(again, just my prediction)
Universal does use the Disney ticket classification.That said, I assume it will be popular enough to be an E (if Universal actually classified things that way).
So is Rip Ride Rockit an E?It’s an E. I feel like historically high thrill rides have been E, animatronics/heavy theming or not. Do we count Tron as an E?
You forgot "exposed steel"......Is it really an "E" tho?
Will there be a queue superbly themed that tells a story?
Will it be really obvious that "Hey, this is a roller coaster!"
And apparently, the make and break criterion for some people (not me, tho)... will it have AAs?
The original ticket system as was used and intended, 100%.Reminder that any ticket ratings are completely arbitrary since that system has been gone for decades now
The ticket system is still very much in use at Disney, Universal and elsewhere. Every attraction at Epic Universe has a ticket designation and has since the earliest days of the park’s development.Reminder that any ticket ratings are completely arbitrary since that system has been gone for decades now
I think if Disney still used the attraction ticket system internally, it wouldn't be arbitrary, because we'd know exactly what they consider each ride to be. The fact that we don't, and end up subjectively arguing about which category each attraction falls into, tells me they don't really use it anymore.The original ticket system as was used and intended, 100%.
The original system used demand/capacity/quality to determine the ticket. The weight of each metric varied drastically, so overall, it could seem arbitrary.
That said, the ticket system people use today is more a set of tiers that reflects quality and scope. That new ticket system is very valid, but also somewhat arbitrary. The old system wasn’t arbitrary because if Disney made a ride a C-ticket, that’s just what it was, but the system for determining which ticket the ride belongs to was pretty arbitrary.
The current ticket system still exists both internally and externally, but absolutely is arbitrary, basically just what certain attractions “feel” like to people. It’s not an exact science (internal and external notions could validly disagree), but I’d say generally one person wouldn’t consider a ride an E-ticket and another person consider the same ride a C-ticket, so I think our general system works pretty well.
Where'd you hear that?Universal does use the Disney ticket classification.
The leaked Pandora plans used the ticket system.I think if Disney still used the attraction ticket system internally, it wouldn't be arbitrary, because we'd know exactly what they consider each ride to be. The fact that we don't, and end up subjectively arguing about which category each attraction falls into, tells me they don't really use it anymore.
They do, they just don’t tell usI think if Disney still used the attraction ticket system internally, it wouldn't be arbitrary, because we'd know exactly what they consider each ride to be. The fact that we don't, and end up subjectively arguing about which category each attraction falls into, tells me they don't really use it anymore.
ExactlyThe leaked Pandora plans used the ticket system.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe in the old system, ticket classifications could also be changed and updated based on guest demand or lack thereof, no? The system did indeed seem somewhat arbitrary if the classification could change on something entirely separate from the merit of the attraction itself and its design, because at that point it became a tool for both operations and marketing. I know in the modern day the tickets are indeed used internally at both Disney and Universal for design classification purposes, but I would love to know if they have direct criteria for how to classify each attraction under the new system. And even if there is a rulebook, how does it differ between the companies?The original ticket system as was used and intended, 100%.
The original system used demand/capacity/quality to determine the ticket. The weight of each metric varied drastically, so overall, it could seem arbitrary.
That said, the ticket system people use today is more a set of tiers that reflects quality and scope. That new ticket system is very valid, but also somewhat arbitrary. The old system wasn’t arbitrary because if Disney made a ride a C-ticket, that’s just what it was, but the system for determining which ticket the ride belongs to was pretty arbitrary.
The current ticket system still exists both internally and externally, but absolutely is arbitrary, basically just what certain attractions “feel” like to people. It’s not an exact science (internal and external notions could validly disagree), but I’d say generally one person wouldn’t consider a ride an E-ticket and another person consider the same ride a C-ticket, so I think our general system works pretty well.
Indeed.Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe in the old system, ticket classifications could also be changed and updated based on guest demand or lack thereof, no? The system did indeed seem somewhat arbitrary if the classification could change on something entirely separate from the merit of the attraction itself and its design, because at that point it became a tool for both operations and marketing.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.