Sir_Cliff
Well-Known Member
I guess it depends on your perspective on exposed coasters, but to the extent that Disney painted themselves into a corner I would suggest it is more that they established a higher standards of quality. In a sense that is a restriction in that it is harder for them to lower that standard of theming and get away with it, however it has also kept them insanely profitable and the leaders in the industry for 70 years now. That is why I would suggest Uni stop building exposed coasters if they truly want to compete with Disney as equals in the theme park industry: they are a visible sign of lower quality in terms of theming.Sometimes I wonder if this isn’t intentional, Disney has painted themselves into a corner and really limited what they can build as a result of their immersion standards, they could never do an exposed ride like Velocicoaster without insane backlash, I think Universal simply chose a level of immersion that places them solidly in the theme park category while also freeing them up to build some amazing amusement park rides without the confines of everything being completely hidden.
All of this comes with the usual caveats that Disney often doesn't meet the standards it set for itself and there is nothing wrong to preferring exposed steel coasters to themed attractions. If Uni is not trying to equal or "out-Disney Disney" on theming and immersion, that's also their prerogative and it may make business sense. If that is the case or if they are still falling somewhat short, though, I think we need to be honest about it.