Andrew25
Well-Known Member
Since wait-time data on Thrill-Data has been recorded, this has been the busiest year yet.I've seen busier.
Unlike previous years with highs and low, every single night has been consistently busy.
Since wait-time data on Thrill-Data has been recorded, this has been the busiest year yet.I've seen busier.
Not according to Comcast - they specifically state they aren't allowing capacity at this time:We're only discussing the most recent quarter, not the full year.
As far as capacity, there are no restrictions on gate capacity at this time (and there haven't been in quite a while)
Not according to Comcast - they specifically state they aren't allowing capacity at this time:
“In terms of Epic itself, our focus now is just driving increased ride capacity. It's a new park and very technologically advanced, so working on the labour and the kinks to drive it to full capacity.
“We've been holding back a little bit to make sure the experience is what we want it to be. We expect it to fully scale up in the months ahead, and we'll really be driving higher attendance, per caps, and improved operating leverage.”
What exactly do you think they meant by "holding back a little bit" - that they are deliberately not running the rides at full capacity. No, they are limiting park capacity. They even added "to make the experience is what they want it to be" Thats specifically attendance. Saying "we're not running the rides at full capacity to make the experience what they want it to be" would equate to "We're deliberately making long lines because thats what people want"They can certainly say whatever they'd like (and I would draw your attention to "ride capacity" as the topic of the quote), but the fact is that they are not hitting capacity limits. Tickets remain available, which means that they aren't "holding back" anything in terms of gate capacity.
Perhaps they're discussing "holding back" capacity in terms of not offering an Annual Pass, but that interpretation would require reading past the words that were actually said
I believe that they are holding back in terms of ride capacity. Say, running 10 cars instead of 15 because they are concerned that the ride may break when a 12th car enters the track.
I thought it was normal to not run at capacity. Disney does not run their attractions at capacity, like Sorin?I believe that they are holding back in terms of ride capacity. Say, running 10 cars instead of 15 because they are concerned that the ride may break when a 12th car enters the track.
That would suggest that even non-peak nights, of which I've been attending, should be unusually busy. They haven't been. I could maybe be convinced of unusually busy weekends, but I was there personally to witness business as usual on the other nights. For the longest time, FNAF was the only house regularly breaking the three digit mark. Even Terrifier was usually only 80-90 until more recently.Since wait-time data on Thrill-Data has been recorded, this has been the busiest year yet.
Unlike previous years with highs and low, every single night has been consistently busy.
They can certainly say whatever they'd like (and I would draw your attention to "ride capacity" as the topic of the quote), but the fact is that they are not hitting capacity limits. Tickets remain available, which means that they aren't "holding back" anything in terms of gate capacity.
Perhaps they're discussing "holding back" capacity in terms of not offering an Annual Pass, but that interpretation would require reading past the words that were actually said
I believe that they are holding back in terms of ride capacity. Say, running 10 cars instead of 15 because they are concerned that the ride may break when a 12th car enters the track.
I thought it was normal to not run at capacity. Disney does not run their attractions at capacity, like Sorin?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.