Epcot82Guy
Well-Known Member
Been MIA for a day. Missed a lot! ha ha
To the above, while I think it is a fun idea, that adds a HUGE amount of overhead. I think that is a reason why Millionaire closed (talent is much more expensive to pay than screens). Furthermore, it wouldn't be necessary for people to ride. They will come and ride just for points.
As for the theme, the major problem is that this all comes off as Disney just seems to not care. MGM has been a mess thematically for awhile. However, I actually think this attraction could have done a nice job bringing back a little cohesiveness. As I said in another thread, this whole problem is JUST HOW CLOSE these are. We aren't talking about any major expenditure; it's just creativity. As some people said, the preshow area could really make this work. Have you enter the studio and speak with live designers who somehow get you into their new Toy Story short. It's the direct clone aspect that doesn't work. I feel the same way for the Seas (we really just needed some new dialogue along the windows to the aquarium). It comes off a disappointing and frustrating that it could fit very, very easily, and the creative efforts there are simply not put forth. It's like attractions are becoing big box stores. They can be lifted and dropped anywhere. The surroundings don't really matter, and some new facade materials are all it takes to "fix" it. That's the antithesis of how Disney built its magic, IMHO.
To the above, while I think it is a fun idea, that adds a HUGE amount of overhead. I think that is a reason why Millionaire closed (talent is much more expensive to pay than screens). Furthermore, it wouldn't be necessary for people to ride. They will come and ride just for points.
As for the theme, the major problem is that this all comes off as Disney just seems to not care. MGM has been a mess thematically for awhile. However, I actually think this attraction could have done a nice job bringing back a little cohesiveness. As I said in another thread, this whole problem is JUST HOW CLOSE these are. We aren't talking about any major expenditure; it's just creativity. As some people said, the preshow area could really make this work. Have you enter the studio and speak with live designers who somehow get you into their new Toy Story short. It's the direct clone aspect that doesn't work. I feel the same way for the Seas (we really just needed some new dialogue along the windows to the aquarium). It comes off a disappointing and frustrating that it could fit very, very easily, and the creative efforts there are simply not put forth. It's like attractions are becoing big box stores. They can be lifted and dropped anywhere. The surroundings don't really matter, and some new facade materials are all it takes to "fix" it. That's the antithesis of how Disney built its magic, IMHO.