I heard some Wishes techs talking about Tink new flight rigging at DL. They said that they heard taht it was coming to WDW.
I know this cant be true. Or can it?
I know this cant be true. Or can it?
BRER STITCH said:Oh ye of little faith......
:zipit:
the towers couldn't extend or retrack becaue then the cables would be on the pavement and buildings across the park. The Path you described is 2,532 feet long, much to long. DL's effect is aprox. 647 feet. The closest path I can find would be from the top of Space to Tom Sawyer's Island, but that's still 1,990 feet, entirely too long. I'm not saying it can't be done, but the numbers are against it, considering DL's lenth.SpaceMountainUK said:I dont know how possible this is but could they build a tower outside the RR tracks by Space Mountain, and a tower say over the other side of the park. these towers could extend (much like the lighting in DL's Fantasmic) when they are needed.....Tink could then fly from over by SM past the castle and back and forth as needed. she wouldnt need to fly the entire length of the cable the entire time, they could just kill the lights on her when shes not part of the show.
Im sure though with the amount of cable needed it would probably be more expensive than creating a new fireworks show altogther!!! LOL
Ya but people are floored by the new rig! It would be well worth the money.MMP said:I think it would be a big waste of time and money to change Tink's flight. People are impressed with the current one, there's no need for change.
No it wouldn't, because it's for a different audience. Disneyland caters more towards the California locals, who go to Disney quite often in comparison to the many once in a lifetime tourist that travel to WDW. About 60-70% of WDW Guests will probably never visit the recent more than one or two more times. Eighty percent of Disneyland's guest go every other weekend.disnyfan89 said:Ya but people are floored by the new rig! It would be well worth the money.
Legacy said:Why reinvent the wheel?
Legacy said:Disneyland caters more towards the California locals, who go to Disney quite often in comparison to the many once in a lifetime tourist that travel to WDW.
Because in the grand scheme of things how much profit will WDW get from spending a few hundred thousands of dollars for a new launch and landing platform for Tink, when the tourist are going to be coming whether its on a fancy flying rig (which the average guest probably won't really care all that much about) or a zip-line (which is still plenty magical in my personal opinion). Would it be worth another ticket-hike? Would you rather see another E-Ticket? About some more attractions in Animal Kingdom?raven said:Because you said it for youself below:
If people are making a once in a lifetime trip to WDW, why not go that extra step to make it even more magical? :wave:
If I remember correctly that is the rough percentage I heard. Let me do some browsing and see if I can find the link.freediverdude said:Really? That big a percentage are Disneyland locals who go all the time? I'm surprised it's that big a percentage. That must be a very different culture in that park then. Anyway, a new type of Tink flight would be nice, but the current one still works too.
How much did it cost to build the rig in Disneyland? I would imagine that if we could build one for as much money as Disneyland's it would be well worth the money. And to say it would not draw attention I think is a lie. One of the things I was most excited about seeing when I went to Disneyland was the new rig for tink. There are more than enough locals that they can market this to in Florida. While a good percentage of WDW is tourist we still have a large local audience that visits the Magic Kingdom several times a year!Legacy said:Because in the grand scheme of things how much profit will WDW get from spending a few hundred thousands of dollars for a new launch and landing platform for Tink, when the tourist are going to be coming whether its on a fancy flying rig (which the average guest probably won't really care all that much about) or a zip-line (which is still plenty magical in my personal opinion). Would it be worth another ticket-hike? Would you rather see another E-Ticket? About some more attractions in Animal Kingdom?
I think it would be a waste of money in the grand scheme of things, whereas in Cali a fancy new flying system will actually be just cause for a lot locals to go back. Orlando is a different attitude.
And I'm not saying this to be a jerk, I'm just looking at it from the logical, financial side of it.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.