At least the old lagoon was nice to look at. Very few people can actually utilize poohs play place.
POOHKILLEDTOAD said:At least the old lagoon was nice to look at. Very few people can actually utilize poohs play place.
Glasgow said:Think of it this way - 20K was expensive to maintain and operate while Pooh is not. That's a lot of spare cash that can go into the development or upkeep of something else. While I miss 20k, I'm willing to wait and see where the extra cash flow might go
CTXRover said:I have a strong feeling that all this "complaining" will be for nothing in a few years.
Tigger1988 said:20k has been closed for YEARS...YEARS before the pooh playground was planned...its gone...get over it and stop blaming pooh for the ride's closing...it was empty space and now some of it is being put to use...
DisKid said:Hopefully, but why couldn't they have done some big ride right now and save the time and money? Take Disneyland for instance: they had the same ride just sitting there idle, and now, they're putting in a Nemo attraction...why didn't they just clone it to WDW right away? That would seem practical if they wanted to do something with the land anyway!
DisKid said:And seriously...how many people go to the MAGIC KINGDOM to play on a playground!?!?!?!?! I don't care if the play ground is themed or not!!! (I am almost 100% certain)They have something very similar over by Splash Mountain....is that used to capacity so often that they need another themed playground??? That would be pretty shocking! Waste of money! Lack of creativity/management on Disney's end once again!
POOHKILLEDTOAD said:At least the old lagoon was nice to look at. Very few people can actually utilize poohs play place.
DisKid said:And seriously...how many people go to the MAGIC KINGDOM to play on a playground!?!?!?!?!
CTXRover said:My guesses as to why they finally reclaimed that land, didn't reopen it with Nemo, or simply start construction on something new:
1. Reportedly, the subs for WDW's 20K ride had already been trashed/dismantled a while ago, unlike DL where their subs are still available. This made reopening WDW's sub ride much more costly and difficult.
2. Although nothing official yet, I imagine that some of the projection technology that will be used for DL's new sub ride can/will be incorporated into a potential new ride for The Living Seas at Epcot. That is still just rumor, but does seem more and more likely. I believe that some of the technology they are using for DL's subs will be used at WDW in some form or another. However, it won't be for just a direct clone, which I would think would make some people happy.
3. WDW is not in the need for another big E-ticket at this particular time. While the MK could use a new E-ticket as it hasn't added one in a while, the resort as a whole has added some big guns in the past 2-3 years, along with the current celebration that lasts until the end of 2006 to keep people rolling through the gates. It wouldn't be a bad idea to start construction on something soon that could open in 2-3 years from now, but I imagine they will use that land for something big when they need something new to advertise/lure people to WDW. Its the whole supply/demand thing.
4. Reclaiming the land provides WDI/WDC with an open canvas for any possible idea. Unlike DL where they are retrofitting an old sub ride, the MK now has enough space to build something truly unique and exiciting. The skeptics would have you believe that will never happen. My gut feeling tells me otherwise. But honestly, who knows. What I do now is that after 10 years of nothing, that precious area of land is now ready for something big and new.
peter11435 said:I have said this a million times. There is still a ton of land left at the 20K site and there is more development to come. Just give them time. The pooh area only takes up a very very small portion of the former site.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.