PiratesMansion
Well-Known Member
Disney's very glad that you feel this way and invites you to please fill out many, many guest satisfaction surveys!enough e tickets already !
Disney's very glad that you feel this way and invites you to please fill out many, many guest satisfaction surveys!enough e tickets already !
embarrassing
Who is embarrassed?embarrassing
Nobody should take issue with you repeating yourself each year if they’re not also to take issue with TP initiating it. I think his ride list (not necessarily his slant) is very fair though. But I’m open to being convinced otherwise.I'm sorry for the hardship I caused you.
And I still disagree.
People darn near faint around here when Disney designates a walk-thru as "an attraction" but when Disney labels something as "transportation" then we're supposed to take it as the last word.
Got it.
Clearly neither Disney nor most of their guests are embarrassed, but perhaps they should be a bit more aware, at the very least, about the capacity of the parks (or lack thereof on a comparison basis).Who is embarrassed?
Nobody should take issue with you repeating yourself each year if they’re not also to take issue with TP initiating it. I think his ride list (not necessarily his slant) is very fair though. But I’m open to being convinced otherwise.
If you count the skyliner and monorail, do you also count the buses? The trams? But there are trams at two different parks, so is that two rides? And if so, are the monorails 2 different rides? Can one say that each bus route is an individual ride?
I’m also surprised that nobody has mentioned the hot air balloon, which even though it’s dumb, is in fact officially listed on the map as an attraction, and meets all definitions of a ride. There’s also the amphicars, the carousel, and the train. For a mere $156, you can ride all four!
I don’t visit only for the parks and I know lots of others who feel the same. I visit to resort hop, ride the transportation (skyliner, monorail, boats) eat at the resorts, Disney springs, etc. There’s a lot more to WDW which is what it set out to do since it’s opening when it was just a magic kingdom, it still offered 2 resorts, monorail and boat transportation, dinner shows, entertainment, water activity, etc. I do think DHS and DAK are in need of more rides for sure, but I still enjoy my time there.Clearly neither Disney nor most of their guests are embarrassed, but perhaps they should be a bit more aware, at the very least, about the capacity of the parks (or lack thereof on a comparison basis).
I just wonder: what is the point of "the blessing of size" if the resort that's about ~500 acres has almost the same number of rides as the resort with ~30,000 acres? Yes, WDW has the amenities, golf courses, DS, water parks, etc. All of that is great. But fundamentally most people aren't coming to WDW for their golfing, to resort hop, or for any of those other things. Nor do the majority go because they really love Finding Nemo: The Musical. They're going to ride Space Mountain, IASW, Tower of Terror, Kilimanjaro, Spaceship Earth, and so on.
Do you disagree with the notion that the resort with the most parks should also, by extension, have the most attractions? And not just by a little bit, but by a lot? Sure, parks should have more than just rides. Absolutely. But thousands of people don't wait to get into DHS each day primarily for the opportunity to eat at the Brown Derby.
WDW has a lot of things going for it, but it's fairly objective to say, in comparison to other parks, that it is underbuilt in terms of ride capacity. In WDW's defense, it's not the only Disney resort where this is the case (Shanghai is also very underbuilt, and you could argue that the Tokyo parks are too), but since there are double the amount of parks at WDW as there are anywhere else, it's much more noticeable. Really, ALL Disney parks could stand to add more ride capacity.
For me, the lack of ride capacity (and corresponding swelling of wait times) IS a deterrent to me visiting WDW, the resort that is closest to me geographically. Perhaps it isn't for you or others, but it is something that affects my decision making, and I do think it has an impact on the average guest's visit to WDW, whether they are consciously aware of it or not.
And I'm not knocking the other things or trying to say that they don't have value.I don’t visit only for the parks and I know lots of others who feel the same. I visit to resort hop, ride the transportation (skyliner, monorail, boats) eat at the resorts, Disney springs, etc. There’s a lot more to WDW which is what it set out to do since it’s opening when it was just a magic kingdom, it still offered 2 resorts, monorail and boat transportation, dinner shows, entertainment, water activity, etc. I do think DHS and DAK are in need of more rides for sure, but I still enjoy my time there.
Yes I hear you, I don’t consider it an attack at all, I’m just stating for me and others I know we focus on both. Yes you have a point about the parks, but I’ve always enjoyed resort time and seeing everything.And I'm not knocking the other things or trying to say that they don't have value.
But if you're going to ask Johnny Tourist why he wants to go to WDW and what he expects to do, you're going to get a lot more people say that they want to go on rides rather than go resort hopping.
There is a noticeable progression of longtime WDW visitors to spend less time in the parks and more time doing other things (i.e. resort hopping) over time. Perhaps part of that is wanting to see everything on some level, but it's worth noting that you don't see this at the other resorts, despite the fact that all of them have resorts that are just as nice at WDW (not every single resort ever, obviously-see Paradise Pier-but many of them are just as good). The only resort at WDW that really has no equal is AKL. My theory is that many WDW regulars slowly gravitate away from the parks and towards the resorts and other amenities in part because parks can be such a hassle to deal with-in part because they just don't have the ride capacity to absorb the crowds they now attract.
I feel like the fact that I (and others) are saying that the resort needs more ride capacity is being construed as some sort of attack or misunderstanding of the resort. I understand that in many ways WDW functions differently than the others and has more to offer than the other theme park complexes around the world. BUT if each WDW park had at least the same number of attractions as DCA does right now-and I'll give WDI the benefit of the doubt that they would build proper attractions and not just vomit flat rides in to accomplish the same goal-would the parks not be more pleasant to experience for every guest? Waits would be shorter, rides could be more regularly refurbished, and so on. All of that would make a better experience for pretty much everyone. Which is why it always interests me that there is so much resistance to even the idea that the parks should all have more rides (or animal trails or shows that aren't 30 years old or whatever the case may be) than they currently do.
I agree with that 100%.Do you disagree with the notion that the resort with the most parks should also, by extension, have the most attractions? And not just by a little bit, but by a lot?
I would agree that they don't think about this, but part of it is that years of Disney and pop cultural osmosis has convinced them that WDW is this unbeatable and perfect vacation, and that it's getting harder and harder for people to ignore that dissonance with what experiencing the resort has become.I agree with that 100%.
The part I don’t agree with is that most guests should be, or ever will be, factoring this in when deciding where to go on vacation. Like I said earlier, if someone lives in the eastern half of the US, it probably doesn’t make logical or financial sense for them to fly far to Disneyland for one part of a week long vacation. And that’s given the slim chance it crosses their mind, because it’s not advertised and none of their friends/family have been. They ultimately want to go to the place that they’ve heard great things about and seen pictures of from their friends/family/etc, and that’s just typical behavior across tourism in general. Evidently we are in the slim minority who have a frame of mind for both places and care to discuss this.
If you count the skyliner and monorail, do you also count the buses? The trams? But there are trams at two different parks, so is that two rides? And if so, are the monorails 2 different rides? Can one say that each bus route is an individual ride?
I’m also surprised that nobody has mentioned the hot air balloon, which even though it’s dumb, is in fact officially listed on the map as an attraction, and meets all definitions of a ride. There’s also the amphicars, the carousel, and the train. For a mere $156, you can ride all four!
I also count the Campgrounds' golf carts and Segways.
And let's count the number of "Attractions." According to Disney, Journey of Water is one...
Epcot is the only park at WDW where I feel like I need 2 days. There's so many things to explore and do. Well, there used to be at least.I’d agree that HS, AK, and EP all need more rides but it’s odd how different each park feels despite similar ride counts, I can spend 2 full days at Epcot and still feel like I didn’t do it all, there’s so much to see and do I don’t really notice the lack of rides, I feel similar with AK (for 1 day), there’s so many trails and shows and things to see I don’t really notice a lack of rides, HS is the one park I feel desperately needs rides, even with the addition of Galaxy’s edge and Pixar it often feels like we are walking in circles searching for something to do.
I’d probably put the next 3 or 4 rides all at HS to make it a full day park, it has enough thrills, it needs a few B-D tickets to eat people.
And let's count the number of "Attractions." According to Disney, Journey of Water is one...
Nice list! I’d be curious what the other 4 parks attractions count is
Lol sure next time you’re at EpcotYou'll have to buy me a drink.
Lol sure next time you’re at Epcot
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.