Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Key line “part of”…
Maybe Disney will throw another bil in for the IOA marvel license?
…so they can NOT build marvel stuff at wdw anyway
Key line “part of”…
You'd have to have the other party be interested in giving up those rights first.Key line “part of”…
Maybe Disney will throw another bil in for the IOA marvel license?
…so they can NOT build marvel stuff at wdw anyway
…I’m not being “subtle sarcastic” enough again, am I?You'd have to have the other party be interested in giving up those rights first.
I pick option C:IIT: People who keep suggesting that Disney+ is a worthless boondoggle and Iger was dumb for spending money on it, now suggesting that Hulu is worth eleventy bajillion dollars and Iger is dumb for spending money on it.
Can't have it both ways.
How is it not contractual? They already signed a binding agreement that determines how much Disney has to pay. Why are you discounting that? We already know the details of the contract and how the pricing will be determined.Because it’s not contractual…it’s non-binding
Comcast: $22 bil
Disney: $5 bil
Comcast: okay…we’ll take $13.5…you “win”
Disney: but…but…I can’t do that! My sweater is choking off the oxygen to my 73 year old brain!!
Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!
There was always the possibility that they negotiated something novel that involved different structures or asset exchanges, but yeah. As long as they've decided to do "Disney buys from Comcast for cash," there's not much of a negotiation to be done on price. A third party will determine the fair value, subject to the previously agreed upon floor.How is it not contractual? They already signed a binding agreement that determines how much Disney has to pay. Why are you discounting that? We already know the details of the contract and how the pricing will be determined.
So, unless you are saying multiple large third party financial institutions are going to purposely inflate/deflate the value then nothing Universal or Disney says is going to matter in the actual pricing.
The “third parties”…work for the “first Parties”…How is it not contractual? They already signed a binding agreement that determines how much Disney has to pay. Why are you discounting that? We already know the details of the contract and how the pricing will be determined.
So, unless you are saying multiple large third party financial institutions are going to purposely inflate/deflate the value then nothing Universal or Disney says is going to matter in the actual pricing.
The third parties are hired to do a one-time job and are not beholden to who hires them. Not only that, but it's a job they need to do accurately to not put off future clients but even if one side doesn't operate in good faith the signed agreement (that is over four years old now) has a mechanism in place to address that.The “third parties”…work for the “first Parties”…
And I wish I had a nickel for everytime
A “binding contract” was cancelled in the span of an hour on an afternoon…
When dealing with two companies this size, I don't think we have to worry about if they are willing to sue or not if they legit think they are getting ripped off.The problem with contracts is to enforce them, you have to be willing to sue and rack up a fortune in time and bills to do that. 99% of the time no one bothers.
Fair. As for where the number comes in, Universals CEO was out there not even a few months ago claiming it was currently worth 30 billion. 1/3 of that minus the outstanding payments puts us somewhere in the 9 billion range so that is what I expect. Low or high 9 will depend on how those evaluations turn out. What we know for sure is that it can't go below the 8.61.How about this: let’s see where the number falls and do a post Mortem?
I think the number will absolutely not $8.61…more like $10-12…but I’m not in the room where the sausage is gonna be made.
Fair?
Fair. As for where the number comes in, Universals CEO was out there not even a few months ago claiming it was currently worth 30 billion. 1/3 of that minus the outstanding payments puts us somewhere in the 9 billion range so that is what I expect. Low or high 9 will depend on how those evaluations turn out. What we know for sure is that it can't go below the 8.61.
You got to love Brian Roberts, he is working overtime to win the PR battle to try and convince everyone That HULU magically more that doubled its value. There is even one interview out there where he was using some logic that based on subscription increases that the actual value is 60 billion. The thing is the value is supposed to be based as a stand alone business entity. So Hulu was marginally profitable in 2019 and today is still only marginally profitable. I am doing this from memory but I believe just before Igor stepped down for Chapek he was tweeking Roberts by basically saying if Roberts liked Hulu so much he would sell it to Comcast for the 27.9 Bill--to which Brian quickly changed the subject.Let us not forget that in 2019 when they picked up Fox's share of Hulu, it was worth something like 16 billion. That's 4 years ago. To suggest now it's worth 45 billion after Fox pulled their content off the platform is not clear to me. And the 45 I'm using is just the middle ground between the spitball figures I'm seeing in articles.
They have already pulled a lot of their content from the platform.We don’t have Hulu here so can’t comment but won’t the value be based on Univeral content being in the platform? Take that and you loose value to the consumer?
They have already pulled a lot of their content from the platform.
You got to love Brian Roberts, he is working overtime to win the PR battle to try and convince everyone That HULU magically more that doubled its value. There is even one interview out there where he was using some logic that based on subscription increases that the actual value is 60 billion. The thing is the value is supposed to be based as a stand alone business entity. So Hulu was marginally profitable in 2019 and today is still only marginally profitable. I am doing this from memory but I believe just before Igor stepped down for Chapek he was tweeking Roberts by basically saying if Roberts liked Hulu so much he would sell it to Comcast for the 27.9 Bill--to which Brian quickly changed the subject.
Isn’t that a bit of an odd thing to do? If you wanted top dollar wouldn’t you leave your content in place to up the price then pull it down the line? Or is it something to do with putting stuff onto Peacock?They have already pulled a lot of their content from the platform.
They need each other…to be fair…You would think that Disney and Comcast would want to cut every tie they have together, so I would love Disney to get the theme rights back but in all honesty, Simpsons I can imagine Universal would be fine to loose eventually and Marvel one aren't a priority for Iger at all by this point.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.