News The Walt Disney Company Board of Directors Extends Robert A. Iger’s Contract as CEO Through 2026

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
Looks like the pro-Peltz stock juicers are seeing the writing on the wall after that WSJ report.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240401_200848_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240401_200848_Chrome.jpg
    107.9 KB · Views: 88

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Wait a minute “pulled ahead”? So like with 3/4 of a billion votes they were behind?

It was NEVER supposed to be that close The goalposts are on wheels here

I still think their major voting blocks declared early and in a coordinated fashion to claim an early lead. I’d agree that 30+% is not great. 40% is not going to be a true victory at all.

We’ll see in two days. But with the three major funds declaring presumably for the company, it shouldn’t be that close.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
Nobody is debating the financial success of MCU

The problem is endgame opened 4 years, 340 days ago…

And how has that trajectory gone since?

A negative slope for you trig fans…

Gotta stop lauding 2015…it was great. But it’s not being replicated.


MCU had THREE top ten hits in 2022 and one in 2023. We’ve gone through this. It’s true even if it’s inconvenient for you.
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
I still think their major voting blocks declared early and in a coordinated fashion to claim an early lead. I’d agree that 30+% is not great. 40% is not going to be a true victory at all.

We’ll see in two days. But with the three major funds declaring presumably for the company, it shouldn’t be that close.
Yeah I imagine they made their decision before the February quarterly report.
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
Not sure I see the contradiction. I'd prefer Iger plan for the company's future beyond his time as CEO, but 2026 is also a few years into the future which gives him time to execute the plans he's talking about.
What plans? He's had 10 years to think of a plan the moment their cash-cow TV networks and ESPN started losing subscribers. People aren't gonna wait til 2026 to see that plan executed, especially if pay TV overall is no longer profitable by then. Paramount Global and Warner Bros. Discovery might not even exist by then; you want Disney to join that group?
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
What plans? He's had 10 years to think of a plan the moment their cash-cow TV networks and ESPN started losing subscribers. People aren't gonna wait til 2026 to see that plan executed, especially if pay TV overall is no longer profitable by then. Paramount Global and Warner Bros. Discovery might not even exist by then; you want Disney to join that group?
What plan do you suggest?
 

WoundedDreamer

Well-Known Member
We have, it’s just hard to argue against the court of opinion rather than cold financial logic. The quarterlies are dramatically improved and the forward guidance is dramatically improved. Money is the determinate of recovery - both fortunately and unfortunately. And short-medium term money at that. Which is why you need leadership who are surrounded by yes man, because there is no other way to really gain confidence of investors in the Parks domains, which are otherwise very much ‘long-term’ investments.

The market believes it (that the company is recovering). Whether it is foolish to do so is opinion. Which I’m actually not opposed to, I’ve personally both thought the company was wildly over valued and under valued in the last 4 years.
But the improvements in the quarterly earnings have been driven primarily by reducing expenditures. That's an admirable move from a financial discipline perspective, but doesn't change the fundamental structural problems facing Disney. Namely, that the linear channels are in terminal decline and the movie studios are struggling to generate profitable content. Nothing has changed to indicate Disney's woes in those two areas are going to end. There are potential fixes, but with no guarantees that they will succeed.

Disney has spent tens of billion of dollars on its "transformation" both in acquisitions and losses on Disney+. Money was no issue as Iger and his hand-picked successor spent $100 billion on Fox, Bamtech, Hulu, and streaming losses. We're still in the midst of Disney's struggle, not because Disney didn't have enough resources. Instead, they failed because their strategic decisions and creative decisions have been terrible. Disney has destroyed tens of billions in shareholder value.

That's not to say there's no reason for optimism. But count me as skeptical that Iger has solved the two major problems facing Disney. I'm waiting to be proven wrong.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Yeah so what’s Iger’s plan?

Streaming- Spinning off India into a JV. Taking a moderate streaming approach (curated Netflix as opposed to Netflix). Increasing ARPU via subscription cost, ads and password sharing. Full US integration of Hulu to help with value and retention.
Sports- ESPN streaming. ESPN linear sporting joint venture.
Parks- A massive capex upgrade for Parks with targeted expansion of all gates over time. DCL new ships (speculative but probable).
Studios- Iger being Iger. Which I think they are hopeful is better than Chapek being Chapek.

Succession - Board lead - a major board refreshment to add people with experience for the process, probably Dana Walden in a COO role 18 months before his scheduled departure.

I think a linear sale might still be slightly on the table, but maybe off?
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Disney has destroyed tens of billions in shareholder value.

Not technically at this current juncture. I’m really not counting the detached from reality streaming bubble when most of their other core business were closed.

Now if the current run doesn’t ‘stick’, fair enough!

I’m cognizant that the stock can’t continue to post another 20-30% or then we are way overheating again unless their overall revenue as you say changes. Margins only get you so far. I think there is more revenue in D+ to come though, we still haven’t seen the December price hikes play out.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Streaming- Spinning off India into a JV. Taking a moderate streaming approach (curated Netflix as opposed to Netflix). Increasing ARPU via subscription cost, ads and password sharing. Full US integration of Hulu to help with value and retention.
Sports- ESPN streaming. ESPN linear sporting joint venture.
Parks- A massive capex upgrade for Parks with targeted expansion of all gates over time. DCL new ships (speculative but probable).
Studios- Iger being Iger. Which I think they are hopeful is better than Chapek being Chapek.

Succession - Board lead - a major board refreshment to add people with experience for the process, probably Dana Walden in a COO role 18 months before his scheduled departure.

I think a linear sale might still be slightly on the table, but maybe off?

That’s just the company line…

Nobody is asking how they’ll generate the profits necessary to do…really anything they would need…from their standalone streaming service?

…there’s a reason why
 
Last edited:

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
I think a linear sale might still be slightly on the table, but maybe off?
I've read one Wrap article suggesting Iger won't sell the networks because he's worried Disney will immediately become a takeover target.

That's exactly what happened when Time Warner spun-off Time Inc. and its magazines in 2014 and was followed a month later by Fox's infamous $80 billion bid; Jeff Bewkes said no thanks and investors never forgave him for that.
 

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
(curated Netflix as opposed to Netflix)
This fundamentally will not work long-term. Netflix’s fire hose of mostly mediocre/bad content means a never ending flood of new stuff that covers a variety of demos. They completely avoid theatrical. Disney’s curation hinges on unevenly-received franchise series, for the D+ side, which throws theatrical releases into imbalance (see: The Marvels). Curation will lead to plateauing sooner rather than later at this scale.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom