The Sorcerer's Apprentice Season 2: International Edition - Discussion Thread

[Zweiland]

<here begins the period for "saving" @Twilight_Roxas, @Wikkler or @Matt7187>​

For how long does this last?

 

[englanddg]

For how long does this last?

And will it prevent posting of the new challenge?

 

[englanddg]

Yes...I have a one track mind.

 

[englanddg]

Also, with the amendment, I get why it includes the prior boardroom, as it's new, but will that always be the case?

Can a player be "revived" at any time?

 

[Zweiland]

And will it prevent posting of the new challenge?

That's why I asked, incidentally.

 

[DinoInstitute]

That's why I asked, incidentally.

I think he said it was just for the week after, until the next board room

 

[DinoInstitute]

Yes...I have a one track mind.

Don't worry, I'm tapping my foot, sitting at my laptop too waiting for the right alert

 

[Zweiland]

Also, with the amendment, I get why it includes the prior boardroom, as it's new, but will that always be the case?

Can a player be "revived" at any time?

I hope not. Even two chances is too many, more than that would make no sense.

 

[jdmdisney99]

Once the next challenge's elimination occurs, a competitor cannot be revived.

 

[DinoInstitute]

I hope not. Even two chances is too many, more than that would make no sense.

Oh, thats a good point, if a revived player gets eliminated, is their revival opportunity gone?

 

[Zweiland]

Here's another reason I don't like the 10th amendment: If someone is eliminated and their team doesn't choose to bring them back, that could lead to hurt feelings. And hurt feelings could lead to anger, and anger could lead to holding a grudge.

 

[jdmdisney99]

I hope not. Even two chances is too many, more than that would make no sense.

Keep in mind the time limit may be shortened. These amendments are always a test and adjust type of thing.

 

[jdmdisney99]

Here's another reason I don't like the 10th amendment: If someone is eliminated and their team doesn't choose to bring them back, that could lead to hurt feelings. And hurt feelings could lead to anger, and anger could lead to holding a grudge.

I thought you were going for the Yoda line for a second.

This will all be taken into consideration. This is in Beta. Feedback is welcome

 

[DinoInstitute]

Maybe there should only be a certain number of revivals available for the whole season?

Such as one per each original team?

 

[englanddg]

Here's another reason I don't like the 10th amendment: If someone is eliminated and their team doesn't choose to bring them back, that could lead to hurt feelings. And hurt feelings could lead to anger, and anger could lead to holding a grudge.

 

[DinoInstitute]

Also, I would assume that perhaps in the Board Room the eliminated person could campaign for why they should stay---er--come back?

 

[englanddg]

Also, I would assume that perhaps in the Board Room the eliminated person could campaign for why they should stay---er--come back?

 

[englanddg]

 

[englanddg]

Well, Team Land can't save, because they have 5.

My team, I can't speak for, but I am pretty sure @Voxel won't want to use our vacation days this early in the game, and that's how I feel. (feel free to tell me if you feel differently)

So, that leaves @ctxak98 and @MA_Screamin ...and if they decide to save someone, that's a 50/50 team split on if to do it or not (and, mind you, that assumes they don't agree with me)...

So, in that case since the new challenge hasn't been posted, I am still team lead, so I'll tiebreak the hypothetical team vote with a Leader Override, and say...Team Air isn't bringing anyone on.

So, it's just up to Team Sea then...

Of course, I'm assuming what the rest of my team would say, cause they aren't here right now to say it. So, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.

Team Air, if you want to discuss this, lets do it in a private chat please. Check your inbox.

 

[englanddg]