I'm moving this to the discussion thread so as to not bog down the actual submission thread with this incoherent argument I've stumbled into and am too stubborn to leave.
Anyway, everything that is being said in the project thread is absolutely unnecessary. I don't know if you, Englanddg, feel threatened by Team Land's project or what, but your discussion and sudden crusade against their project is just entirely unnecessary and unwarranted. They made their project. It's great. Truly. I liked it. It works perfectly in France. Honestly, I think it's the only ride out of the trio that was made FOR the French rather than Disney fans. Just because it's based off of an IP doesn't mean that it's automatically blacklisted, like it can never be mentioned or suggested. As I've stated earlier: this is a game based off of hypothetical situations. If they made a Harry Potter ride, and justified it by saying that Universal tore theirs down, ok. They're wrong. It doesn't work like that. But they could very easily say that, HYPOTHETICALLY, Spielberg sold the rights to Disney, and Disney immediately set off to franchise it. It's entirely plausible in a HYPOTHETICAL scenario, as this competition is designed to be in.
I'm sure you're going to reply to this with further incoherent babble, and I'm going to try to ignore it, but I know perfectly well that I'm too stubborn not to respond, so goodnight until then.