The Sorcerer's Apprentice Season 2: International Edition - Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Voxel

President of Progress City
It's very odd… :confused: IfI did something that small, I unknowably did it. I never do small images… that's whats so odd..
Maybe it was an upload issue in photobucket or copy and past gone wrong. If you copy an imagine from a post sometimes the large version doesn't follow
 

JokersWild

Well-Known Member
I'm moving this to the discussion thread so as to not bog down the actual submission thread with this incoherent argument I've stumbled into and am too stubborn to leave.

Anyway, everything that is being said in the project thread is absolutely unnecessary. I don't know if you, Englanddg, feel threatened by Team Land's project or what, but your discussion and sudden crusade against their project is just entirely unnecessary and unwarranted. They made their project. It's great. Truly. I liked it. It works perfectly in France. Honestly, I think it's the only ride out of the trio that was made FOR the French rather than Disney fans. Just because it's based off of an IP doesn't mean that it's automatically blacklisted, like it can never be mentioned or suggested. As I've stated earlier: this is a game based off of hypothetical situations. If they made a Harry Potter ride, and justified it by saying that Universal tore theirs down, ok. They're wrong. It doesn't work like that. But they could very easily say that, HYPOTHETICALLY, Spielberg sold the rights to Disney, and Disney immediately set off to franchise it. It's entirely plausible in a HYPOTHETICAL scenario, as this competition is designed to be in.

I'm sure you're going to reply to this with further incoherent babble, and I'm going to try to ignore it, but I know perfectly well that I'm too stubborn not to respond, so goodnight until then.
 

Voxel

President of Progress City
I'm moving this to the discussion thread so as to not bog down the actual submission thread with this incoherent argument I've stumbled into and am too stubborn to leave.

Anyway, everything that is being said in the project thread is absolutely unnecessary. I don't know if you, Englanddg, feel threatened by Team Land's project or what, but your discussion and sudden crusade against their project is just entirely unnecessary and unwarranted. They made their project. It's great. Truly. I liked it. It works perfectly in France. Honestly, I think it's the only ride out of the trio that was made FOR the French rather than Disney fans. Just because it's based off of an IP doesn't mean that it's automatically blacklisted, like it can never be mentioned or suggested. As I've stated earlier: this is a game based off of hypothetical situations. If they made a Harry Potter ride, and justified it by saying that Universal tore theirs down, ok. They're wrong. It doesn't work like that. But they could very easily say that, HYPOTHETICALLY, Spielberg sold the rights to Disney, and Disney immediately set off to franchise it. It's entirely plausible in a HYPOTHETICAL scenario, as this competition is designed to be in.

I'm sure you're going to reply to this with further incoherent babble, and I'm going to try to ignore it, but I know perfectly well that I'm too stubborn not to respond, so goodnight until then.
I just like to point out a fact check is I was wrong with Spielberg rights statement. TinTins ownership is actually quiet controversial
 

JokersWild

Well-Known Member
I just like to point out a fact check is I was wrong with Spielberg rights statement. TinTins ownership is actually quiet controversial

I might have to look into that. It sounds interesting. Really, though. I really feel that the rights are a bit irrelevant for this project. Yes it's a good thing to look into for armchair imagineering, but we really shouldn't be restrained by IP ownership in situations such as this, unless it's something outrageous like ET in MK or Jaws: Coming to Animal Kingdom. And I find it absolutely deplorable that Team Land is now being accused of cheating.
 

MonorailRed

Applebees
I'm moving this to the discussion thread so as to not bog down the actual submission thread with this incoherent argument I've stumbled into and am too stubborn to leave.

Anyway, everything that is being said in the project thread is absolutely unnecessary. I don't know if you, Englanddg, feel threatened by Team Land's project or what, but your discussion and sudden crusade against their project is just entirely unnecessary and unwarranted. They made their project. It's great. Truly. I liked it. It works perfectly in France. Honestly, I think it's the only ride out of the trio that was made FOR the French rather than Disney fans. Just because it's based off of an IP doesn't mean that it's automatically blacklisted, like it can never be mentioned or suggested. As I've stated earlier: this is a game based off of hypothetical situations. If they made a Harry Potter ride, and justified it by saying that Universal tore theirs down, ok. They're wrong. It doesn't work like that. But they could very easily say that, HYPOTHETICALLY, Spielberg sold the rights to Disney, and Disney immediately set off to franchise it. It's entirely plausible in a HYPOTHETICAL scenario, as this competition is designed to be in.

I'm sure you're going to reply to this with further incoherent babble, and I'm going to try to ignore it, but I know perfectly well that I'm too stubborn not to respond, so goodnight until then.

But if was Belgium until 1995 though… That's what get's me…

It's interesting legally, if it's realistically. Not augmentative…..
 

englanddg

One Little Spark...
And I want to say something right now. @englanddg admit it, you always try to pick on someone and start something. Just like last year. You always say it is in fun, but it really isn't. So stop it for the sake of everyone here, and so you and your team don't get punished for breaking one of the amendments
I pick on no one. I made specific observations that had to do with concept, not people.

So, don't think that I am not about the competition, I am.

Also, don't insinuate that I am doing otherwise, because I am not.
 

Voxel

President of Progress City
I might have to look into that. It sounds interesting. Really, though. I really feel that the rights are a bit irrelevant for this project. Yes it's a good thing to look into for armchair imagineering, but we really shouldn't be restrained by IP ownership in situations such as this, unless it's something outrageous like ET in MK or Jaws: Coming to Animal Kingdom. And I find it absolutely deplorable that Team Land is now being accused of cheating.
It is interesting, the big issues is the extremely high royality fees they charge. Even to the point that photograph isn't even allow in the TinTin museum. Ownership is also planning to ignores Herges will by creating a new story so they can continue the copyright in 2053
 

DinoInstitute

Well-Known Member
I am only responding to this in the discussion thread as well. I don't want to be a part of the argument, but like JokersWild, I just feel the need to respond.

Our team did not cheat. Cheating would have been hacking. The website to see what the other teams are doing and using that info against you. We completed the challenge, and whether we wi or lose should not be because if copyright laws that really have no play here.

I think I'm going to go now before anything else happens
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom