CraniumCommand89
Well-Known Member
The Dark Knight Rises was my favorite Nolan Batman film and I think many of its successes tend to be overlooked. Since you asked for thoughts I will give them. Overall, there are some good changes, but I disagree with most of your major plot changes.
Bruce Wayne's guilt is the reason he becomes Batman in the first place. Guilt, anger, remorse, are all essential to the character. He's not a "crybaby." He's been severely injured over the years, he's older, and made Batman the fall-man for Harvey while covering up a lie about the man who was with the woman he loved. He has no family other than Alfred. No friends, no love.
Why would he be in Gotham with a broken back? Bane just drops him back off at Wayne Manor? The prison creates a sense of helplessness for Bruce where he can do nothing. Being in Gotham doesn't add that level of guilt.
Too crystal clear? There were many lines that I still need the subtitles for because they are muffled. The fight in the sewer with Batman I can barely understand the lines. And seeing the IMAX original voice, it was even worse. Leaving the original voice is a poor choice in my opinion.Let's get this thread fired back up with a redo of the single most polarizing film between myself and fellow podcast co-host BlueDragonFive...The Dark Knight Rises...
I'll be honest...This was one of my most anticipated films of all time. Right up there with the likes of Jurassic World. Ironically enough, they both turned out to deliver similar feelings for me and I'll get to Jurassic World another day. At least with JW the film managed to be entertaining on a basic level all the way through. The same absolutely cannot be said about this dreary, sluggish, plot-hole infested final chapter in what should have been a perfect trilogy.
Let's get to the positives first. For the most part I love Bane and how he was executed and want to keep most of that in tact with the redo of the film. Bane was absolutely the reason I was looking forward to this movie so much. For as many problems as I have with this film, the contrast between the visual of Bane and his fancy-pants speaking voice is absolutely genius and for my money among the single most inspired things Christopher Nolan has ever done as a filmmaker. There's moments with Bane in the movie that are absolutely chilling, my personal favorite being...
The one thing I would change about Bane's execution outside of obvious writing things I'll get into that absolutely diluted the entire character in the third act would be the way they did his voice in post production. I'm one of the few who GREATLY preferred the original trailer voice that was Tom Hardy's on set delivery. Yes it was more muffled, but I think that only added to Bane's intimidation. In contrast, while I still love Hardy's accent and vocal delivery, pretty much ALL of Bane's lines in the finished films are done with blatantly obvious ADR recordings. This was done to combat people who complained about not being able to understand him, but in turn made Bane's dialogue TOO crystal clear. In my version we keep Hardy's original on-set vocal performance for the most part. ADR can certainly be used here and there as is the case with every performance in the editing room, but ADR shouldn't be the single thing that's used for Bane's dialogue.
And outside of Bane...That's honestly it on the positives I have
This is just a ridiculous viewpoint.They turned Bruce Wayne into an unlikable crybaby who quit being Batman because his would-be girlfriend got killed...Say what you will about Batfleck killing people in the new DC movies, but I think THAT move was the single biggest betrayal of the Batman character I've ever seen. They tried to do the jump in time that The Dark Knight Returns did so well, but absolutely failed in Batman's motivations. Instead they turn Bruce Wayne into a self-loathing recluse for a majority of the run-time which, while does contribute to his overall redemption arc, could have VERY easily been accomplished without the notion of him hanging up the cowl. Batman's early retirement is the single most glaring issue I have with Nolan's entire trilogy, so let's just be done with it.
Bruce Wayne's guilt is the reason he becomes Batman in the first place. Guilt, anger, remorse, are all essential to the character. He's not a "crybaby." He's been severely injured over the years, he's older, and made Batman the fall-man for Harvey while covering up a lie about the man who was with the woman he loved. He has no family other than Alfred. No friends, no love.
Again, I disagree. She is crucial to the story. A non-comic book fan would not know Talia means Talia Al-Ghul. Not only that but Bruce's denial of the League of Shadows is critical to his evolution into Batman. Several themes from The Dark Knight were continued. The Dent Act's reveal as a cover up set into motion Bane's takeover of Gotham. The Joker's perception on the world came true. Introduce anarchy and everything becomes chaos. Bane's anarchy of Gotham created the divide of Gotham. Anarchy that got Bane tossed out of the League of Shadows.Close second in terms of HUGE issues I have with Nolan's trilogy...Talia Al Ghul. I'm not even going to give Nolan the credit by calling her by her scripted name for most of the movie. She's Talia. We all knew she was Talia as soon as she was cast. Talia simply shouldn't exist in this movie. Her being the main puppet master was a HUGE sin in making Bane into essentially the henchman/muscle who seemed like he had a greater purpose but was really just following orders. Talia is gone in this version. We can put the League of Shadows stuff to rest from Batman Begins. There's no need to have the awkward shoehorned in Liam Neason cameo or the vague allusions to the Lazarus Pit. One of my big problems with Rises is that it tries to be a direct sequel to Begins while ignoring or pushing aside a lot of the plot elements that made The Dark Knight so captivating. I respect wanting to bring the trilogy full circle, but it came at the cost of continuation of a lot of the themes established in TDK.
These are fine, but I fail to see how they change the actual plot. Selena Kyle does get Bruce out of his depression, in the final scene at the cafe. He's leading a life with her.Let's keep Ann Hathaway as Catwoman. I don't particularly care for her character arc in the finished film, but that's a problem with the writing less so the performance. To be honest I wasn't as blown away by her as a lot of people her and felt her performance was good but not anything too memorable, but she's likable and works well with Nolan so for the purposes of this let's keep that casting intact. The main difference I'd make for her is that I'd like to see this film start with her and Batman already knowing each other. I can actually see she being the thing that gets Bruce out of his depression surrounding Rachel. Half for the potential romance and half for the thrill of chasing a criminal on his level...as a proper Batman/Catwoman dynamic should always be. I'd also have Selina working for Bane as a means to an end in a desperate situation. This would entirely replace the Talia dynamic that Bruce had in the finished film.
Joseph Gordon Levitt as "Robin" (again, REFUSE to call him by the name Nolan wants us to call him by ) is also gone. I think JGL did a good performance and honestly he's a decently written character...but he's not a Batman character and doesn't have the stronger ties to the comic lore that we'd need for this to really hit home. That's why replacing him would be rookie GCPD officer Renee Montoya played by Rosario Dawson, who Gordon has taken under his wing. Montoya would represent the value of Gordon trusting people in the GCPD after that was put into question in The Dark Knight. I also think having her be set up as a potential Bat Woman would be definite change from the comics but one that would make sense within the context of this trilogy. I'd also throw in Gordon's partner Harvey Bullock played by...Let's say Jeff Bridges.
I like the Riddler reference but do not like your exclusion of the prison. Why do we fall? So we can rise again. The awe in the shot of the bats flying around Bruce before he jumps out of the hole, which I take to be a reference to the hole in the ground where he developed his fear of bats, is the whole basis of the film in my opinion.This film would definitely have the strongest emphasis on the GCPD out of the three in the trilogy due to the plot development of Batman being a public enemy at the end of The Dark Knight. Rolland Dagget would still be in the film but serve as the corrupt personal antagonist to Gordon who is leading the manhunt for Batman. Harvey Bullock would definitely be gun-hoe on catching Batman himself but we'll see throughout the film that he's a genuinely good man and a straight cop, and inspite of being against Batman is also an antitheses to Dagget.
As I said, there's no Batman retirement. The film picks up one year after the events of The Dark Knight on the year anniversary of Harvey Dent's death. Much of the plot plays out the same way including Gordon having guilt about the Two-Face cover up and Bane taking the city under siege. There is a clear manhunt for Batman but he's still going after criminals including The Riddler who was see in a one-scene role played by Michael Emmerson.
The film's first act ends with pretty much the same exact fight between Bane and Batman..what is EASILY the best executed scene in the entire finished product. Now here's a big difference. One of the things I hated about Rises was the weird prison that was a vague allusion to the Lazarus Pit and had REALLY confusing rules (so prisoners can just try to escape any time they want...okay??) To hell with that entire subplot. Let's not take Bruce Wayne out of Gotham City (which in turn creates the single biggest plot hole I've ever seen in any movie with the question of how the hell does he get back to Gotham City within a few hours after escaping the prison when it's been hammered in throughout the movie that he has ZERO resources...Let alone has time to do a meticulous gasoline Bat Symbol in the bridge )
No...Bruce is in Gotham City, with a broken back, in the middle of all the chaos that's being caused by Bane's regime. That is SOOO much more effective than having him watch vague news footage on a TV that he smashes after about 10 minutes of being in the prison anyways. Batman is in the place he loves as it's being torn to shreds, and there's not a damn thing he can do about it. At this point I want to mention that Alfred absolutely DOESN'T abandon him in this version and stays by his side as he recovers from the back break.
Why would he be in Gotham with a broken back? Bane just drops him back off at Wayne Manor? The prison creates a sense of helplessness for Bruce where he can do nothing. Being in Gotham doesn't add that level of guilt.
I think Gordon should have died and I like how you play in the dramatic element here. I would have him die via video broadcast to Bruce in his cell. Being the final nail in the coffin for Bruce thinking there is no hope left.Bane's siege goes on for six months as Bruce recovers and we feel that passage of time as the city slowly gets more and more torn apart. We see a big emphasis on average citizens becoming unhinged and violent out of sheer desperation. Some of the iconic stuff from the finished film like the plane hijacking cold-open, Bane making his grand introduction at the football game and the chilling shot of the bodies hanging from the bridge will be kept in tact.
The end of the second act comes as Bruce is recovering and Gordon ends up in the hospital. This was one of the HUGE disappointments in the movie to me. In the teaser trailer for Dark Knight Rises we don't get much...All we really get is a hospitalized Gordon who looks like he's on death's door...begging for Batman to come back. To me the scene I was most looking forward to was Bane absolutely destroying Gordon and beating him to a pulp. While it'd certainly be hard to watch, the emotional gravity of the situation certainly had to lead to a powerful moment, right...
Instead of being the big act two low of lows, Gordon being in the hospital is more of an afterthought of him stumbling around in the sewers and getting shot. The injury that put him in the hosptial was barely even explaiend and it CERTAINLY didn't come off like he was on death's door in the final film like the emotional gravity of the teaser trailer would have you come to expect.
Let's entirely redo the events surrounding Gordon's death. Bane knows that Bruce Wayne has recovered at this point, and he's bidding his time and training for a rematch. Bane hasn't located the Batcave (Which will be on the outskirts of Gotham and secluded...) so he wants to draw Batman out. What's the best way to do that..hit him where it hurts. It's common knowledge that Batman and Gordon have a personal working relationship. With that Bane abducts Gordon and has a huge public display in front of the press where he beats Gordon brutally within in inch of his life. This would lead to the dramatic "he must...he must..." moment where Gordon begs Batman to return in the hospital. In this version, let's actually kill Gordon off. He already had a fake death in The Dark Knight and this would be something that's emotionally devastating to both Bruce and the audience, and would certainly be a call to arms for Batman to finish Bane once and for all.
Batman should not kill Bane. Nope. He should not give in to blind rage. I think it should play out exactly how it does in the film already. This version would ruin the entire arc of "no-killing" throughout the trilogy and end it on a poor note. If you're going to change the ending, which I think is the most perfect book-end to a trilogy, then have Batman die to save Gotham. But I would implore that the ending does not need to be changed.The ending of the film is a much more bare-knuckle brawl that doesn't include the ridiculous bomb being carried away plot. In fact there's no bomb. Bane takes control of Gotham through sheer man power as well as just doing things that generally cause chaos such as releasing the prisoners at Blackgate. Instead we get a drag out fight between Bane and Batman that lasts about twice as long as in the finished product. While this might be controversial, I actually think Batman should kill Bane. It'd be in a situation where he has absolutely no other choice in addition to the blind rage Bruce has in the aftermath of Gordon's murder.. and you'd clearly see how emotionally wrecked Bruce is by having to do this. I think this would be a perfect and somber way to end the trilogy after all the exploration of Batman's no-kill policy in The Dark Knight.
Throughout the film we'd get an in depth exploration into the philosophical idea that Batman creates his own villains, something that truly haunts Bruce in the wake of Joker's reign of terror in The Dark Knight. This coupled with the sheer devastation Bane unleashed leads to the ultimate decision for Batman to retire. The film ends on a cliffhanger though as we see Bullock and Montoya discovering the Bat Cave on the outskirts of Gotham and putting the pieces together about Bruce Wayne's identity. While Montoya is inspired and in awe of Bruce's heroism as Batman, Bullock is wanting to call it in and get back up down there right away. Were left with a fade out of Montoya and Bullock in the Bat Cave with the sound of approaching police sirens as we fade to black. We are left to wonder, with one final Nolan stroke of ambiguity, what becomes of Bruce Wayne after this revelation..
I'd LOVE to hear everyone's thoughts. This is a pitch that's been in my head for a long time. It's not a complete redo of a film, just a retooling of certain elements that I think would make the overall finished product infinitely tighter and more well told than the film we ultimately ended up getting.