britain
Well-Known Member
He’s at pirates and princesses now as a blogger if you want to say hi
@WDW Pro is also now saying there's a big plan to retcon the sequel trilogy's grumpy old Luke into a big fake out to protect slightly older Grogu.
To which I say:
1) It sounds like a ridiculous amount of effort to just add a few different shades of meaning to TLJ (instead of withdrawing from the Force out of discouragement, Luke has withdrawn from the Force to protect Grogu - and withdrawing from the Force will naturally put you in a funk).
2) It doesn't solve Rise of Skywalker's problems which are more convoluted than "I don't like Luke's attitude in Last Jedi".
3) It might sound like a Filoni revolution, but it's par for the course for Star Wars. ALMOST EVERY SINGLE STAR WARS FILM retcons what the previous film intended the story to be.
Empire: Decides to make Vader Luke's father, which wasn't the plan.
Return of the Jedi: Decides to make Leia Luke's sister, instead of another "another."
Phantom Menace: Decides to focus on little kid Anakin instead of Jedi hunter Vader.
Attack of the Clones: Decides to minimize Jar-Jar's role in the story.
Revenge of the Sith: No real adjustment here - just less and less Jar-Jar.
Force Awakens: Original Lucas treatments all thrown out.
Last Jedi: Left turn swerves all around.
Rise of Skywalker: Right turn swerves all around.
So while I feel this Mandalorian / Luke plan sounds bad, it's just typical Star Wars myth making.
Last edited: