Disney Irish
Premium Member
I guess my question is, why does having the land set between films constitute it being “out of continuity”? That’s not how continuity works.
Out of continuity would be when something within the land contradicts the period of events and the places it is attempting to convey. An example is that Gringotts is set during Voldemort’s rule, but the rest of the land seems to sit somewhere around the fifth movie.
Assuming Kylo Ren dies in IX, that doesn’t make the land “out of continuity”, it just means he can’t die in Rise of the Resistance, because the story isn’t at the point where he dies yet.
It’s the same principle as Rogue One, or any other in-between movie in the series. They’re not out of the continuity, they’re just showing you what happens before you get to the end.
Its a discussion forum. Someone raised concerns over how it would be weird for them to see characters in Batuu that may not be part of the SW films much longer after those films are released. And then some of us continued with that discussion, including someone who pointed out that Lucas tries to maintain continuity through all their mediums, ie books, films, etc, so it wouldn't make sense not to change the land because of it. So that is where the whole continuity discussion came in.
Anyways, in the end it won't matter, the land will be amazing.