The Magic Kingdom is way too crowded already. Sticking SW:GE would be a nightmare. It will be interesting to see the new lands effect on the rest of DLR and guest satisfaction.Fantastic explanation! I had been wondering how the opposite placement of each land would change things; south facing at Disneyland and north facing at DHS. Plus how the difference in light/humidity at each location would amplify the look of opposite placements of each land; golden sunlight in dry Southern California and whiter sunlight in humid Central Florida.
And yes, it's quite obvious the land layout was designed to fit Disneyland first, and then trimmed around the edges and plopped into DHS.
The Rivers of America at WDW's Magic Kingdom is in such a sad and sorry state now, I wonder if WDI ever considered putting Star Wars into the northern tier of Magic Kingdom Park and redoing their Rivers of America like Disneyland got? I know why they chose DHS (a dying park in desperate need of expansion and investment), but I just wonder if they ever gave a passing thought to duplicating the Disneyland Star Wars placement at Magic Kingdom in WDW?
The question mark in picture 1 is the berm at DHS where supposedly Disney can expand the land which will be needed on day one.
I look forward to the 80 pages of arguments over the above in the morning. Like I have always said, Disneyland's is bigger, WDW's could be bigger. Let the expletive measuring contest continue!
The Magic Kingdom is way too crowded already. Sticking SW:GE would be a nightmare. It will be interesting to see the new lands effect on the rest of DLR and guest satisfaction.
You were already drawing on the picture, would it have killed you to draw a smiling tree or two?
I look forward to the 80 pages of arguments over the above in the morning. Like I have always said, Disneyland's is bigger, WDW's could be bigger. Let the expletive measuring contest continue!
From eyeballing it and not really knowing the scale all that jumps out is the missing third entrance. What do the green lines represent? The purple ones are the same except that circle.
I look forward to the 80 pages of arguments over the above in the morning. Like I have always said, Disneyland's is bigger, WDW's could be bigger. Let the expletive measuring contest continue!
I look forward to the 80 pages of arguments over the above in the morning. Like I have always said, Disneyland's is bigger, WDW's could be bigger. Let the expletive measuring contest continue!
That space is hardly usable. Its the size of a quick service restaurant. The lands have an e ticket expansion plot built into them, and that ain't it. It is to the right of millennium falcon.I think your question mark in the DHS SW picture inadvertently contradicts your own argument that there is more space at DL SW.
Martin has said numerous times the plot of land can fit a ride the size of AlcatrazThat space is hardly usable. Its the size of a quick service restaurant. The lands have an e ticket expansion plot built into them, and that ain't it. It is to the right of millennium falcon.
Disneyland was 55 acres when it opened, and right now it is about 85. That includes show buildings and backstage, but a lot of disneyland's acreage is backstage islands and cast areas that aren't show buildings. Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge is 14 new acres, bringing Disneyland to 100 acres, and with little to no cast-only areas. All of it is on stage or show buildings. So the acreage of the park gets a 17 percent bump and that new dedicated space is designed to handle crowds better than any other area of disneyland with a higher onstage to backstage ratio. This is only a simplification because I'm leaving out the ride capacity on battle escape and falcon, but then again, people will be crammed densely in their lines regardless. Disneyland's attendance would have to climb more than 17 percent when galaxy's edge opens for it to lift crowding noticeably over crowd levels now, given the 17 percent boost to capacity.
It'll draw more people to Disneyland as expected, as it is designed to, but capacity will max out before it gets any more "dangerous" than it already is. The park is artificially crowded. I don't know the numbers but if we guess that 40% of the visitors on any given day are annual passport holders, they can shed those people and replace them with guests paying 120$ a day. They can't go much higher than they already are with crowds, so as soon as the crowds come rolling in, they'll phase out passports through a variety of techniques or raise the prices of passports. When/as they phase out annual passports or raise their price, the park will be insanely more profitable as the per capita spending and average gate price will climb.
All this fear over how disneyland will handle the boost in attendance is misplaced. Disneyland can handle it. They have, what, 50 rides? They're used to being crushed with crowds, too. When 20,000 extra people show up at Disney Hollywood Studios, however, different story. They'll have nothing to do. 4 hour waits for midway mania and tower of terror. They'd all get wasted at that new bar on grand avenue as they await their fastpass return times, but that bar wont be enough. Just look at what dlr is doing with downtown disney! star wars VR, 3 new bars/restaurants, and an expanded naples. They anticipate an older audience coming to dlr for star wars and are getting ready for them.
Martin has said numerous times the plot of land can fit a ride the size of Alcatraz
I never saw the floats as floats. If they're old and recycled, then they hold up well over time and the animatronic (are they? or are they puppeted?) animals look good and have great expression, IMO.
You then have the live performance with live singing, dancing, and acrobatics. And the songs are great. And they use the songs of the movie without it being a book report. And it has humor. And audience participation.
Comparing it to full (or nearly full) length Broadway show spectacles is apples to oranges. FotLK has as much, if not better, setting than Broadway shows like Godspell. It's a more intimate and interactive show. Also, I've seen Patti Lupone in several Broadway shows and I caught her in Sweeney Todd where there were only five performers on stage and they were doing all the parts and all the instruments too. Super minimal, but fantastic. So, I don't see a boxy warehouse as being a limitation. I've seen top notch Broadway musicals in such a setting or on small, plain stages. Never thought of them as cheap.
That space is hardly usable. Its the size of a quick service restaurant. The lands have an e ticket expansion plot built into them, and that ain't it. It is to the right of millennium falcon.
Disneyland was 55 acres when it opened, and right now it is about 85. That includes show buildings and backstage, but a lot of disneyland's acreage is backstage islands and cast areas that aren't show buildings. Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge is 14 new acres, bringing Disneyland to 100 acres, and with little to no cast-only areas. All of it is on stage or show buildings. So the acreage of the park gets a 17 percent bump and that new dedicated space is designed to handle crowds better than any other area of disneyland with a higher onstage to backstage ratio. This is only a simplification because I'm leaving out the ride capacity on battle escape and falcon, but then again, people will be crammed densely in their lines regardless. Disneyland's attendance would have to climb more than 17 percent when galaxy's edge opens for it to lift crowding noticeably over crowd levels now, given the 17 percent boost to capacity.
It'll draw more people to Disneyland as expected, as it is designed to, but capacity will max out before it gets any more "dangerous" than it already is. The park is artificially crowded. I don't know the numbers but if we guess that 40% of the visitors on any given day are annual passport holders, they can shed those people and replace them with guests paying 120$ a day. They can't go much higher than they already are with crowds, so as soon as the crowds come rolling in, they'll phase out passports through a variety of techniques or raise the prices of passports. When/as they phase out annual passports or raise their price, the park will be insanely more profitable as the per capita spending and average gate price will climb.
All this fear over how disneyland will handle the boost in attendance is misplaced. Disneyland can handle it. They have, what, 50 rides? They're used to being crushed with crowds, too. When 20,000 extra people show up at Disney Hollywood Studios, however, different story. They'll have nothing to do. 4 hour waits for midway mania and tower of terror. They'd all get wasted at that new bar on grand avenue as they await their fastpass return times, but that bar wont be enough. Just look at what dlr is doing with downtown disney! star wars VR, 3 new bars/restaurants, and an expanded naples. They anticipate an older audience coming to dlr for star wars and are getting ready for them.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.