Sequels- Jungle Book 2 and others

[CAPTAIN HOOK]

They are just examples of Disney "cashing in" on the success of the original - there is usually very little connection to the original either.

 

[WDWspider]

Um... I watch movies if they interest me, and for sequels if the idea is clever like Santa Clause 2 or if I just really couldn't get enough the first time like Jurassic Park. So Disney should make sequels, but I think they aren't spending enough time into creative stories on many of them... Cinderella 2 was a great example of a bad sequel. However... Peter Pan 2 presented many new aspects... like a lost girl for instance. So they are fine to do it I guess, just be sure they have neat ideas. In the case of Aladdin, there was a big fan base ready for more, so it didn't have to be so creative, but luckily that story lends itself to all kinds of ideas. Jungle Book easily leads on to the question... What happens next IMHO. However Happily ever after movies do not, so Sleeping Beauty and Snow White should not be continued, however... I think a Prequel could possible work for Sleeping Beauty and a story just on the Dwarfs without Snow White... see... there is always an angle. Should it be done, why not, as long as you don't hurt the integrity of the original. A bad sequel like Return to Oz does not ruin the original, and a good sequel like Aliens doesn't hurt the original (if anything it strengthens the original). This is an easy profit for Disney, and it adds to the adventures of Disney franchises while boosting the freshness into new minds. I would enjoy to see a sequel to Alice in Wonderland