ryguy
Well-Known Member
Lets not lose sight of the most important thing here. Animal Kingdom's attendance tells the whole story. If it was so great it would be right behind MK in attendance. In the end the only opionions that really matter are those who are shelling out money to enter the park. So far we have heard there response loud and clear, the park just isn't that great. EE is a nice addition but its not a savior in the long run. Most average park guests (those who attend every few years) will probably think that EE is overhyped, a glorified Big Thunder Mountain. Would you go back to Magic Kingdom just for BTMRR?? Personally I wouldn't, not for sixty bucks. I think you will see a spike in attendance for a year or so and than it will flatten out. I know I am not racing back to ride EE. The fact of the matter is you still don't have a lot of bang for your buck compared to the rest of the parks. I think the park needs another animal attraction. (live ones) Frankly, I can see the same animals at the AKL for free, why would I pay $60.00 for the "Animal Kingdom"?