RUMOR: Disney Princess branding being removed?

Dead2009

Horror Movie Guru
Original Poster
Came across this on Twitter and well, discuss away


Don’t worry, classic female Disney characters like Belle, Cinderella, and Snow White aren’t going anywhere. Those characters and their stories have a gigantic presence in the Disney theme parks, Disney films old and new (hello 2019 Aladdin film with Jasmine), and in a new endless stream of merchandise from plastic tiaras to designer handbags. That stuff is all here to stay. What I think may be going away is the “Disney Princess” branding.

“Disney Princess” was a brand created in the early 2000s by former Disney Consumer Products chair Andy Mooney. The OG squad included Snow White, Cinderella, Aurora, Ariel, Belle, and Jasmine. Tinker Bell was briefly a member, but she was later replaced by Tiana and Pocahontas. Later Merida and Rapunzel were “inaugurated” into the pantheon with elaborate ceremonies. Moana was added with less fanfare much later. The Disney Princess branding spawned a thousand parodies and memes: Disney princesses with careers, Disney princesses grown old, real housewives of Disney princesses on SNL, and on and on. The cultural impact could not be overstated.

But then cracks in the monolith began to appear. Indication of the diminished importance of the Princess brand started showing when Frozen’s Anna & Elsa did not, as had been widely expected, make it onto team princess. Perhaps they were a strong enough team on their own to not need the support of a cobbled-together group of girls. Or maybe Elsa’s status as a queen set them apart from the others. Or maybe the brand was becoming less relevant.

More recently, we’re seen a slow dismantling of the princess domination. The large center room at the Magic Kingdom’s Emporium had reigned as the epicenter of princess gear for more than a decade. But now the price of princess costumes has dropped and the princess room turned into a sales point for tee shirts.

And new terminology is appearing — Disney Heroines. Our reporter Christina Harrison encountered this when researching pressed pennies. And this summer’s offering of Disney-themed girls’ tees at Uniqlo was also branded with Disney Heroines, not princesses.

The Heroine language allows for more flexibility. Minnie Mouse is not a princess, but she is a heroine to many – and she’s the first of the non-human characters to start making her way into the new group. Is Nala next? What about other strong female animals in the Disney films? Or is this the way to welcome Elsa? Or any of the Star Wars or Marvel women who save the world?

Like I said, Cinderella is not going anywhere. I mean, have you see that castle? But I have a feeling that in the next decade we’ll be calling her a heroine before calling her a princess.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
That reminds me, what ever happened to the "Disney Animals" brand that was suppose to launch sometime this year? They announced it last year at a French Disney conference.

BNAzv6i.png
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
PETA probably complained on that one.
I even created a thread dedicated to this. Maybe they might give more info at D23 (Wishful thinking).
 

eliza61nyc

Well-Known Member
Because while women can be Heroines, we can't have men being Heroes... :cautious:
I think it's more like one sex always being cast one way. For example one reason I never liked horror movies almost without a doubt the females in them would do something stupid and get killed.... Then along came Jamie Lee Curtis. ,😉
 

Tom P.

Well-Known Member
It might be a way to get away from the very negative connotations associated with the early "princesses". The "one day my prince will come and save me" type of portrayal.
Some Disney princesses base their whole life around getting a man who can take care of them. Others are strong, independent women who don't need a man to come rescue them.

Know what? There are women like both of those things in the real world. I don't think Disney has a bad mix of female characters in their animated films. And I definitely don't understand why the term "princess" would imply anything negative. But in our hyper-sensitive society today, I suppose anything is possible.
 

Marianne75

Member
Disney is still using the Dream Big Princess campaign. They just added another BBB location to GF. As a mother of a 7 year old girl, princesses are still a thing. So is the love of all things Frozen. I just don't see them completely getting rid of 'princesses'. Really I don't think most kids care if the characters are referred to as a 'princess' or a 'heroine'. People that do care are taking things way too far. Liking an animated princess as a kid doesn't determine who you'll be as an adult.
 

Gitson Shiggles

There was me, that is Mickey, and my three droogs
It might be a way to get away from the very negative connotations associated with the early "princesses". The "one day my prince will come and save me" type of portrayal.

That to a degree, and by expanding who qualifies for the new reported lineup takes the pressure off being inclusive. In the end, Disney has decided the lineup has run its course. They want to inject new life into their merchandise sales with the reassembled lineup.
 

KCheatle

Well-Known Member
My gut reaction is that heroine is not the right word....I completely understand the concept, but there's gotta be a better descriptor out there???:oops: But who knows...Disney will probably push the word enough with advertising that public opinion will shift and the world will summarily change the initial interpretation of the word to be "a strong female," and secondarily a terrible deadly drug. 🤷‍♀️Maybe with enough advertising, Disney can even change the what we call "heroin" to something else??? 😏
 

Kingoglow

Well-Known Member
When will the start to cater to the boys?
Nameless pirates and princes don't really provide families with much to offer young boys at Disney World. In fact the whole thing leans far too much in favor of young girls. I would think that they (Disney) would start to work on a more inclusive culture. But everywhere I look, experiences are weighted heavily to princesses.

Obviously, that big castle belonged to Charming and his family much longer than Cinderella lived there... Shouldn't the dining experience be Charming's Royal Table? Maybe with an entire experiences with the 5 top princes?

Would like to see BBB offer Alladin, Eric, Flynn or Snow White's prince to their full ensembles of boys costumes.

We have had way too much of all of the princess junk.
 

HoldenC

Well-Known Member
I think it's time to do away with princesses for a bit, the focus on females in the Disney canon is a little stale and boring. How about some iconic princes/kings?! We need more male representation, ones who are not second class characters consistently waiting to save a dumb heroine, court and fall in love with her. 🤷‍♂️
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Inducting Mulan, which they sorta had to do for diversity, really watered down the meaning of "princess" to... heroine.

But even then, is Snow White a heroine for successfully running away, befriending dwarfs, and being tricked into eating a poison apple? And what heroic deeds did Aurora do?

But this isn't supposed to make sense... it's all marketing and branding and whatever works. Having both brands, princess and heroine, would seem likely.

Of course, this opens up the can of worms of engendered titles... Is it that important to distinguish a person as being a actress, rather than simple an actor? A comedienne rather than simply a comedian? A heroine rather than simply a hero? After all we don't distinguish other roles by gender. We don't talk about protagonistrixes, copettes, or fire fightresses.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom