Rose&Crown
Well-Known Member
Did they just hope everyone forgot they said fountains would hide those hideous things? I mean we all knew that was bogus but did they ever backtrack that or just ignore it?
I've actually started thinking that the most likely targets for removal might be Out There, Touch the Sky, and How Far I'll Go/Go the Distance since there are rumors of Happily Ever After returning and all of these segments would therefore become redundant.As for thoughts on a 2.0 version with updated segments, this sounds unfortunate.
- Coco is a highlight and could arguably nail it in the pre-finale spot, but they need space for another Latin America IP?
- Mulan and PatF drag (the latter has its moments but is otherwise too loud, too frenetic, and too much). Could they be shortened, please?
- BatB doesn’t have much of a raison d’être, as far as this show goes, yet Brave might be on the chopping block?
They just quietly removed the sign advertising the fountain functionality and dodged any questions about it during the Harmonious debut interviews.Did they just hope everyone forgot they said fountains would hide those hideous things? I mean we all knew that was bogus but did they ever backtrack that or just ignore it?
On the days they tested some patterns akin to what was shown in the art, it did indeed make them look worse.I'm surprised they stopped. Like, there's no way the fountains made it look WORSE, might as well keep trying.
On the days they tested some patterns akin to what was shown in the art, it did indeed make them look worse.
Personally I feel like the fountains would have made it worse. Water features of certain scales are noisy. Also they've publicly tested the fountains before and oh boy was it ugly... The barges would have more attention being drawn to them. As of now nobody really cares about them besides locals and hardcore fans. They're just there and are irrelevent to everyone walking throughout WS until 2 hours before showtime.I'm surprised they stopped. Like, there's no way the fountains made it look WORSE, might as well keep trying.
I guess still trying to use the fountains would be an implied admission that the barges look awful and worthy of being covered, while drawing attention to them with the 50th logo says "there's no problem; we are unshamed!".
Also, probably cheaper to shut them off.
Oh hell no they can't remove the first segment. It's literally one of the best intros to any theme park fireworks show probably ever and the HarmonioUS marketing was literally built around that segmentI've actually started thinking that the most likely targets for removal might be Out There, Touch the Sky, and How Far I'll Go/Go the Distance since there are rumors of Happily Ever After returning and all of these segments would therefore become redundant.
It's probably the least at risk as it's a medley, but I still think it would be highly problematic to have shows with 3-4 overlapping sections since the goal is to get people to spread out and watch both.Oh hell no they can't remove the first segment. It's literally one of the best intros to any theme park fireworks show probably ever and the HarmonioUS marketing was literally built around that segment
And that's why the parks are in the state they are. Glad you rationalized it and accepted it. I'm sure the company appreciates your exceptionally low standards and continued support.The barges didn't look as bad in person as I'd expected reading comments on here, that's an honest answer to your question. Most people will realise that's different to me saying I love the view of them or that me enjoying the show is an endorsement on how great they look. I wish they came out just for the show but they don't, I've had to accept that as I wasn't part of the decision making process. Did it ruin my trip, no. Do I wish they were elsewhere, yes. Did I love the show Harmonious, yes. See how it works, one thing doesn't mutually affect the other. The three Epcot newbies I took didn't even mention the daytime eyesore. When I asked them later about it explaining that many hated it, their response was it was worth having them there all day for the show at night. You see some people have different views than others.
The barges didn't look as bad in person as I'd expected reading comments on here, that's an honest answer to your question. Most people will realise that's different to me saying I love the view of them or that me enjoying the show is an endorsement on how great they look. I wish they came out just for the show but they don't, I've had to accept that as I wasn't part of the decision making process. Did it ruin my trip, no. Do I wish they were elsewhere, yes. Did I love the show Harmonious, yes. See how it works, one thing doesn't mutually affect the other. The three Epcot newbies I took didn't even mention the daytime eyesore. When I asked them later about it explaining that many hated it, their response was it was worth having them there all day for the show at night. You see some people have different views than others.
I assume Joe that you've never given a cent to Disney in any way since the barges appeared? I'm sure you can link online petitions you've started too telling Disney how not one more cent will go their way till the barges are removed? If not then you're supporting the company by continuing to pay them and the rest is just that you hate them quite a bit more than me and seemingly want people to admire your stance whilst still funding Disney.And that's why the parks are in the state they are. Glad you rationalized it and accepted it. I'm sure the company appreciates your exceptionally low standards and continued support.
I expected them to be worse solely on what I read on here. I don't like them and they probably weren't as bad as some on here said imho, don't like them there though.Agree to disagree. Those things are horrendous and absolutely detract from ones enjoyment of the area. But... standards and whatnot.
I don't know about Joe, but I haven't given the 1 cent to them since before they even started installing those things.I assume Joe that you've never given a cent to Disney in any way since the barges appeared? I'm sure you can link online petitions you've started too telling Disney how not one more cent will go their way till the barges are removed? If not then you're supporting the company by continuing to pay them and the rest is just that you hate them quite a bit more than me and seemingly want people to admire your stance whilst still funding Disney.
Cancelled two WDW trips and have none scheduled. Every dollar you spend just reinforces their strategy. You have nobody to blame but yourselves.I don't know about Joe, but I haven't given the 1 cent to them since before they even started installing those things.
Well, except for Disney+; DW and kids still think they need it. Sigh.
"anybody who doesn't agree with me has low standards"And that's why the parks are in the state they are. Glad you rationalized it and accepted it. I'm sure the company appreciates your exceptionally low standards and continued support.
They're not pretty but they're really not that big of a deal and I am in the group of people who have seen them in real life. Not once did I think "man, my day sure would be much better if those barges weren't there"Agree to disagree. Those things are horrendous and absolutely detract from ones enjoyment of the area. But... standards and whatnot.
And there is the definition of your standards. Noted....but they're really not that big of a deal...
Yes, I am not offended by show equipment. That is where my standards lieAnd there is the definition of your standards. Noted.
If only the creators of Disneyland's Fantasmic! and World of Color had your passion for theming, show, and integrated design!Yes, I am not offended by show equipment. That is where my standards lie
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.