News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

csmat99

Well-Known Member
Im not a lawyer and have no real legal knowledge of this situation. But, to the best I can understand it...this is the basic problem:

RCID is a public municipality that....by law....MUST remain seperate from Disney. RCID, by law is NOT supposed to be "loyal" to Disney. If it IS found that RCID was beholden to Disney, then the people that caused this to happen were breaking the law. If this happens, that it will be argued that RCID was literally a fraud. Yes, even the bonds that RCID issued were fraudulant too. The town you live in is NOT supposed to be under the thumb of the companies that operate in your town. If so....that is a CLEAR conflict of interest of your municipality. Towns/cities/counties answer to the public...the people of your state. They are NOT tools of corporations. This is the law in Florida.

I think that all of the communications between Disney and RCID will be subpoenad under Florida's Sunshine Law and if those records show Disney giving illeagle orders to RCID....this whole thing will come crashing down in a horrible way for Disney.

If RCID is deemed to be fraudulant and all those hundreds of millions in RCID bonds are all fraudulant? I dont know....but this "could" be the nastiest rabbit hole that Disney could have ever fallin in to.

This "could" be something that RCID and Disney staff might facing if there is enough evidence. Actual fraud and crimes that could land people in jail. I do suspect that "wistle blowers" will now come out from everywhere soon???

Lets hope this is NOT the case. Let's hope that Disney PROVES that they did NOT use RCID this way and that they never broke the legal wall between them. Let's hope the state gets all the documents and sees nothing illeagle was done by ANYbody.

Let's all hope for the best!!
Cliffy - you are wrong and correct you are not an attorney but then talk about fraud like you understand what that means in this case.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Those go into the counties coffers.
Yes, which is the benefit lazyboy is inferring. That the improvement of the land in the district creates a direct benefit to people outside the district as well... in this case.. the tax base the counties get to collect on while also getting the bonus of having someone else pay for their services too.

The thread was responding to a statement that RCID wasn't to directly benefit Florida.. which obviously there are ways it directly benefits Florida (and the counties) -- by doing work for them and still giving them an improved tax base.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Are they? They don't seem to provide any evidence to that fact. They keep supporting the anti-business agenda. They seem to now be anti-corporations, which is like a 2008 Dem thing. Next they'll be occupying Wall Street. We live in the upside-down.
I have to agree, we live in the upside-down now.
But it's not one parties fault. A lot of upside-down is happening on both sides.
In my opinion, you can't blame the party on this RCID mess. This is all RonnyBaby.
 

LAKid53

Official Member of the Girly Girl Fan Club
Premium Member
Yes, which is the benefit lazyboy is inferring. That the improvement of the land in the district creates a direct benefit to people outside the district as well... in this case.. the tax base the counties get to collect on while also getting the bonus of having someone else pay for their services too.

The thread was responding to a statement that RCID wasn't to directly benefit Florida.. which obviously there are ways it directly benefits Florida (and the counties) -- by doing work for them and still giving them an improved tax base.

As a property owner, TWDC would have been taxed by both Orange and Osceola counties, whether RCID exists or not.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I think it's pretty clear the legislators go where King Ronny tells them to go.

Actually, it was. He called the special session. This FL Legislature has pretty much done whatever he's asked for. Unlike his two predecessors.
This thread started because of a comment made by a legislator. The governor joined in afterwards. They have agency. They chose to do as he desires and should be held responsible just the same.
 

LAKid53

Official Member of the Girly Girl Fan Club
Premium Member
This thread started because of a comment made by a legislator. The governor joined in afterwards. They have agency. They chose to do as he desires and should be held responsible just the same.

I never said the Florida Legislature wasn't complicit. They are. However, the governor, after speaking to Chapek privately about HB 1557 and Chapek's statement that TWDC would work to repeal the now law, came out and said he would consider abolishing RCID if the Legislature sent him a bill.
 

LAKid53

Official Member of the Girly Girl Fan Club
Premium Member
Correct. But if RCID did not exist those counties would be funding all of the services and infrastructure that RCID provides with the same tax revenue they receive from TWDC currently. The taxes collected by RCID would not exist.

Which is why we property owners in Orange County were justifiably concerned regarding the dissolution of RCID.
 

Schmidt

Well-Known Member
I never said the Florida Legislature wasn't complicit. They are. However, the governor, after speaking to Chapek privately about HB 1557 and Chapek's statement that TWDC would work to repeal the now law, came out and said he would consider abolishing RCID if the Legislature sent him a bill.
The revisionism is amazing. Of course this was started by Ron. The legislature has been along for the ride.
 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
Are they? They don't seem to provide any evidence to that fact. They keep supporting the anti-business agenda. They seem to now be anti-corporations, which is like a 2008 Dem thing. Next they'll be occupying Wall Street. We live in the upside-down.
The term I hear is "anti-elitist" and "anti-globalist". Which seems to translate as anyone with a bachelors degree or higher and anyone with a passport or financial interest in a foreign owned company... basically, anyone with a 401K.
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
The term I hear is "anti-elitist" and "anti-globalist". Which seems to translate as anyone with a bachelors degree or higher and anyone with a passport or financial interest in a foreign owned company... basically, anyone with a 401K.
Ding ding ding ding ding 🛎️ 🛎️ 🛎️ we have a winner. This is why the shift towards anti-science and the shift away from corporate interests. It’s also part of why there’s been a major shift in how the suburbs are voting. GA didn’t “turn blue” because of urban Atlanta, it’s the suburbs that flipped. Same goes for PA where I live. The suburban counties directly surrounding Philly were swing counties for decades but have slanted heavily towards Dems in the past 5 or so annual elections. It’s also why I believe we need a 3rd party more than ever. If you are educated but don’t buy into the progressive agenda there’s nowhere to go. I see more people than ever voting for a candidate because they want the other guy to lose rather than because they actually support the candidate. I just pick candidates based on who I think will do the best job, but ultimately these people are still held somewhat to party agendas which makes it hard to support them.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom