News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

KrzyKtty

Well-Known Member
Basically it was the language that gives investors the confidence that RCID would exist after taking their money.. the state law that granted RCID the rights to issue bonds also guaranteed they would to be able to exist and continue their means to complete their obligation.

AKA if this bond was backed with RCID tax income... RCID can't have that ability to tax taken away until the bond obligations are met. It opens a whole new avenue of people that could file suit against the state/RCID and path for RCID to push back that ISN'T addressed in the new law.
Thank you. You've been incredibly helpful and very patient with me 🤣.

Either way I think I'm going to sit back and end up seeing what happens over the next year or 2. Nothing's going to be figured out or solved today. And at the end of the day it's not entirely or really my issue either way since I do not live in this state. I don't see this affecting visitor day-to-day operations really. Worst case prices get more expensive again, which is on par anyway.

Bonus is that this might finally cost Bob Cheapscape his job though.
 
One of the reasons I got sucked into the site a while ago was finding out that local politics about OC/Disneyland was actually interesting reading.
Hope the same doesn't happen at on the other coast. Boring is better. Also when I go to the parks I'd rather be escaping and not entering into the center of social/political drama.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
This is incorrect. There are tons of ways to raise revenue without raising sales or property taxes. For example, the Florida toll authority could place a gigantic toll booth in front of every entrance to the resort and charge $20 to enter the property. Alternatively, Orange County could change its permit fee schedule to charge per man hour used in the permit application process (by which Disney will far outscale any other entity in the county). They could further astronomically raise permitting fees solely for businesses the size of Disney (by employee #s or customer #s), which would ultimately only apply to Disney.

Has no one in this thread ever worked for government before? This stuff is basic.
You just keep proposing things that are blatantly illegal.

Neither the Turnpike nor CFX can just drop tolls wherever and doll out the money to counties.

There is no way to make permit reviewers take longer to review Disney applications. The requirements for a permit are not some unknown. If the documents are in order then they are in order.
 

AdventureHasAName

Well-Known Member
They could also raise property tax rates across the board... and then offer a homeowner tax credit or small business tax credit or some such thing.

It's like... Congress can't raise taxes just on childless people. But they CAN raise taxes on everyone... and then increase the Child Tax Credit.

I'm not sure why you said "this is incorrect." I was agreeing with you.
No, I agree with you. I was saying that what the guy in the tweet was saying was incorrect.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
It's not a magic switch that Disney will automatically start paying. The counties will need to design the new tax regime.
Ignoring that previously claimed it was a magic switch and differences in property appraisal, that still means the state plan that exists right now is to drop the liability on the county taxpayers. The counties coming up with a solution afterwards doesn’t make the state plan and present situation a lie. It doesn’t help that many of the proposed solutions being bandied about are in fact highly constrained or just illegal.
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
Still does not cover the costs. Give it a year
Disney's current tax payments to RCID fund RCID services and finance RCID debt. If Orange County needs to take on the services and the debt, they'll find a way to increase taxes on Disney roughly in line with what Disney will no longer be paying to RCID.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Bonus is that this might finally cost Bob Cheapscape his job though.
We’ll see. I think stock price and profits/revenues will seal the deal for him.

Wild prediction? If/when things cool off, and it looks like this RCID won’t disappear, and stock price/D+ continues to flounder, expect Chapek to leave, Iger comes back as interim CEO, while a full search for permanent CEO takes place.
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
We’ll see. I think stock price and profits/revenues will seal the deal for him.

Wild prediction? If/when things cool off, and it looks like this RCID won’t disappear, and stock price/D+ continues to flounder, expect Chapek to leave, Iger comes back as interim CEO, while a full search for permanent CEO takes place.
Wildest scenario is that if the board were to sell the company to the highest bidder one would have come up with approx $250B. When Comcast tried their hostile bid takeover , the Disney Board said their offer was too low.
 

Animal_Kingdom_09

Active Member
Sorry if I'm being stupid, But after googling that exact law, and what you said above, that still means basically the new law is recognizing the fact that they can't really dissolve anything without a majority vote of the landowner's?

Well, when used in a contract, notwithstanding means that the items following the word are exceptions to the other clauses in the contract. In this case, the legislature is overriding the 189.072 paragraph. Whether they can actually do that will probably be decided by the Florida Supreme Court.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom