Tara Mae
New Member
2 said:Look, just because you don't like Mission:SPACE doesn't mean it was a bad idea to have it replace Horizons. If Horizons was still open today it would basically be exactly how the WoL pavillion is now. Also, once again there is this paradim that has been going on ever since M:S opened, BELIEVE ME not that many people get sick on M:S!
Also, your rating on RNRC. Walt would have disappointed because it's a thrill ride? Come on. Then why was it then that Walt came up with the original plan for Space Mountain, which at the time was the premere thrill ride in America! Ok then, since you think Disney doesn't need rollercoasters lets just rip out Space Mountain and BTMRR and stop construction on Everest and make them all character meet and greats instead. And then we can all sit back and watch WDW's attendence plummit.
The only thing I agree with you on is your rating of SGE.
Almost every Disney forum I go to has at least 100 people who have gotten sick from M:S. It's all over the news, papers, everywhere.
I never said Walt didn't like rollercoasters, I only said he'd be disappointed. Disney was meant to only have one or two thrill rides. And I say this in OPINION, of course. Did you not ever notice that Walt's version of thrill was pretty much the cheap version? Space Mountain and BTMRR aren't really considered thrill rides and rollercoasters. They're tame compared to waht RNRC is. They have a family theme, kids can enjoy them. Everest? I've talked to many children who will never go on it because of it's scare factor. Same goes for RNRC. These same kids enjoy Space Mountain and BTMRR...wel, maybe not Space Mountain, but BTMRR for sure. As for attendence plumit? If they really wanted to see thrills, they've got Universal. Disney, in Walt's mind, was meant for family.
Again, opinion, don't bash. Good Goddess.