Poll: It's a Small World load area?

Which version of the IaSW load area do you prefer?

  • The original 1971-2005 open, colorful look

    Votes: 103 73.0%
  • The 2005-present Disneyland-esque look

    Votes: 38 27.0%

  • Total voters
    141

The Empress Lilly

Well-Known Member
This is another way Magic Kingdom has suffered by being considered just an imitation of Disneyland.
This!

DL imported IaSW as an afterthought. The ride wasn't designed for the DL scale or setting. IaSW was placed in a difficult location, a bit in the back. It was given the now iconic Blair façade to make it work in its environment. With impressive result, but not as impressive as the fully cohesively designed DL lands. To this day DL IaSW is an isolated pavilion, feeling closer to FW philosophy than the Castle Parks.

At WDW all this could be corrected. The MK SW was properly integrated into FL, with a proper façade. And a playful loading area that corresponded with the 70s vibe all around. IaSW was made to feel more intimate now, feels more in line with the rest of FL rather than a separate experience near FL.

Only to be undone by later work. By Anaheim-centric designers who saw only an inferior ride that would no doubt be dieing to finally be remade to look a bit like their superior version.


Original MK > DL, always.
Nobody was interested in building in inferior clone. Obviously. That would've been a disaster, marketing wise, creatively, or as Roy's monument to his brother.
It was later generations who slowly rendered the magnificent MK into an inferior, charmless, zoo-like clone.

Not that the difference in charm in this area should be overstated:
20200815_135911.jpg
 

Raineman

Well-Known Member
This!

DL imported IaSW as an afterthought. The ride wasn't designed for the DL scale or setting. IaSW was placed in a difficult location, a bit in the back. It was given the now iconic Blair façade to make it work in its environment. With impressive result, but not as impressive as the fully cohesively designed DL lands. To this day DL IaSW is an isolated pavilion, feeling closer to FW philosophy than the Castle Parks.

At WDW all this could be corrected. The MK SW was properly integrated into FL, with a proper façade. And a playful loading area that corresponded with the 70s vibe all around. IaSW was made to feel more intimate now, feels more in line with the rest of FL rather than a separate experience near FL.

Only to be undone by later work. By Anaheim-centric designers who saw only an inferior ride that would no doubt be dieing to finally be remade to look a bit like their superior version.


Original MK > DL, always.
Nobody was interested in building in inferior clone. Obviously. That would've been a disaster, marketing wise, creatively, or as Roy's monument to his brother.
It was later generations who slowly rendered the magnificent MK into an inferior, charmless, zoo-like clone.

Not that the difference in charm in this area should be overstated:
View attachment 491064
Another perfect example of the mass DL worship in the Disney organization and some Disney theme park enthusiasts, and the mindset that “all other Disney parks are inferior to DL, cause it’s the original, it’s where Walt walked!”, which is an extremely annoying and myopic view. “The WDW IASW queue is too different than the one on hallowed ground in Anaheim! We must change it so it is the same!”
 

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
I'm a sucker for fountains. Have always enjoyed them since a wee lad seeing themed ones at shopping malls. The fountains in IASW's former loading area were a nice touch that I missed after the refurb. They were simple, yet pleasant for the ambiance.

agree, and the tiki room use to have one, and the pirates plaza use to have one, and the list goes on but those two come to mind. oh and the Italy pavilion in the front which they filled in with potted plants. :banghead:
 

Homemade Imagineering

Well-Known Member
YES -- so much is made of the smell of Pirates and Splash Mountain, but my memory has it that Small World used to have its own distinct smell. Particularly the load area.

The ride of course does still smell like water, but not the way it used to - I think it was the fountains that kicked it up into the air in the load area. There's a home video we have of Small World from the early 90's, and any time we watch I can't help but "smell" it.

Difficult to describe . . . almost like distilled water reacting with metal, but somehow a little bit sweet . . . does that sound right to anyone else?
That’s how I feel about Disneyland’s IASW. To me it smells slightly different from all of the other water attractions around the entire resort to me, and it’s very hard to explain the smell. I guess you kind of summarized it’s unique smell with your description (even though you were referring to pre 2005 WDW IASW), as the water at Disneyland’s IASW smells almost sweet.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
The original Polly fountain was beautiful I can remember standing there just thinking wow!
View attachment 491106
Then it was changed to just another run of the mill down grade

View attachment 491108
Typical Disney these days generic is the word
There was more then one reason for downsizing the Poly fountain and even the other internal fountains. Cost to maintain was certainly a large factor but there was a health factor as well. It was called mold allergy's. It came in well after all those fountains were installed. It became a problem all of a sudden like peanut allergies, gluten problems, problems with carbs, etc. Another blight on human existence came in about the same time. I am, of course, talking about Starbucks! Coincidence? I think not!
 

Max Duane

Member
This is another way Magic Kingdom has suffered by being considered just an imitation of Disneyland.


Disneyland‘s “it’s a small world” is the only one that is uncovered for load and unload. Magic Kingdom, Tokyo Disneyland and Hong Kong Disneyland all have indoor load and unload. Disneyland Paris goes outside but remains under a roof.
right, i just meant the clocktower piece though. i believe all the other parks besides MK has the main facade outdoors
 

TheX8

Member
I remember before the refurb and where the exit is now the entrance. Their use to be a light up photo of a bunch of kids dressed up in different outfits above the exit with s "It's a Small World after All" on the sign. One thing that stood out was a girl in a Native American headress...I have been searching for that image as it was something I thought just had that great 70's vibe from the photo..Anyone know what I'm referring to?

You mean this one?
Screen Shot 2020-08-15 at 10.06.36 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-08-15 at 10.06.38 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-08-15 at 10.06.40 PM.png
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Speaking of MK's IaSW... are the canal's flooring really covered completely in coins from guests, or did Disney put in a faux flooring that looks like it?
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
I’m partial to the indoor Tokyo refurb that made the first turn into a show scene.

WDW’s expanded sets, better staging, and flooded rooms have always had an edge over DL’s beautiful façade; DL’s interior is obviously the temporary 1964 World’s Fair version put on permanent display.

EDIT: Even in Tokyo, I hate the inclusion of cartoon characters. ;)

 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom