Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
OK, now I'm getting freaked out. I have been going to WDW every year (except this one) since 1983 and I honestly do not remember it ever looking like that at WDW. I may be losing it!
OK, now I'm getting freaked out. I have been going to WDW every year (except this one) since 1983 and I honestly do not remember it ever looking like that at WDW. I may be losing it!
This!This is another way Magic Kingdom has suffered by being considered just an imitation of Disneyland.
My half awake self thought the crowd of people in the left photo was a boat! Took a moment of thinking "Are the boats really that big?"
Yes, This when the former Exit became the Entrance...Just out of curiosity, when did they install the sign above the entrance out front (the one with all the kids in the boat)? Was that part of the 2005 refurb too?
Another perfect example of the mass DL worship in the Disney organization and some Disney theme park enthusiasts, and the mindset that “all other Disney parks are inferior to DL, cause it’s the original, it’s where Walt walked!”, which is an extremely annoying and myopic view. “The WDW IASW queue is too different than the one on hallowed ground in Anaheim! We must change it so it is the same!”This!
DL imported IaSW as an afterthought. The ride wasn't designed for the DL scale or setting. IaSW was placed in a difficult location, a bit in the back. It was given the now iconic Blair façade to make it work in its environment. With impressive result, but not as impressive as the fully cohesively designed DL lands. To this day DL IaSW is an isolated pavilion, feeling closer to FW philosophy than the Castle Parks.
At WDW all this could be corrected. The MK SW was properly integrated into FL, with a proper façade. And a playful loading area that corresponded with the 70s vibe all around. IaSW was made to feel more intimate now, feels more in line with the rest of FL rather than a separate experience near FL.
Only to be undone by later work. By Anaheim-centric designers who saw only an inferior ride that would no doubt be dieing to finally be remade to look a bit like their superior version.
Original MK > DL, always.
Nobody was interested in building in inferior clone. Obviously. That would've been a disaster, marketing wise, creatively, or as Roy's monument to his brother.
It was later generations who slowly rendered the magnificent MK into an inferior, charmless, zoo-like clone.
Not that the difference in charm in this area should be overstated:
View attachment 491064
I'm a sucker for fountains. Have always enjoyed them since a wee lad seeing themed ones at shopping malls. The fountains in IASW's former loading area were a nice touch that I missed after the refurb. They were simple, yet pleasant for the ambiance.
Poly lobby.agree, and the tiki room use to have one, and the pirates plaza use to have one, and the list goes on but those two come to mind. oh and the Italy pavilion in the front which they filled in with potted plants.
Poly lobby.
The original Polly fountain was beautiful I can remember standing there just thinking wow!Poly lobby.
That’s how I feel about Disneyland’s IASW. To me it smells slightly different from all of the other water attractions around the entire resort to me, and it’s very hard to explain the smell. I guess you kind of summarized it’s unique smell with your description (even though you were referring to pre 2005 WDW IASW), as the water at Disneyland’s IASW smells almost sweet.YES -- so much is made of the smell of Pirates and Splash Mountain, but my memory has it that Small World used to have its own distinct smell. Particularly the load area.
The ride of course does still smell like water, but not the way it used to - I think it was the fountains that kicked it up into the air in the load area. There's a home video we have of Small World from the early 90's, and any time we watch I can't help but "smell" it.
Difficult to describe . . . almost like distilled water reacting with metal, but somehow a little bit sweet . . . does that sound right to anyone else?
There was more then one reason for downsizing the Poly fountain and even the other internal fountains. Cost to maintain was certainly a large factor but there was a health factor as well. It was called mold allergy's. It came in well after all those fountains were installed. It became a problem all of a sudden like peanut allergies, gluten problems, problems with carbs, etc. Another blight on human existence came in about the same time. I am, of course, talking about Starbucks! Coincidence? I think not!The original Polly fountain was beautiful I can remember standing there just thinking wow!
View attachment 491106
Then it was changed to just another run of the mill down grade
View attachment 491108
Typical Disney these days generic is the word
right, i just meant the clocktower piece though. i believe all the other parks besides MK has the main facade outdoorsThis is another way Magic Kingdom has suffered by being considered just an imitation of Disneyland.
Disneyland‘s “it’s a small world” is the only one that is uncovered for load and unload. Magic Kingdom, Tokyo Disneyland and Hong Kong Disneyland all have indoor load and unload. Disneyland Paris goes outside but remains under a roof.
I remember before the refurb and where the exit is now the entrance. Their use to be a light up photo of a bunch of kids dressed up in different outfits above the exit with s "It's a Small World after All" on the sign. One thing that stood out was a girl in a Native American headress...I have been searching for that image as it was something I thought just had that great 70's vibe from the photo..Anyone know what I'm referring to?
Awesome that you found this!! I could have sworn there was a native american girl in the group..But, this shows how rare this picture was..And how my memory tends to be...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.