D
Deleted member 107043
I guess so. But it looks futuristic and cool. Haha
This is why you are one of my favorite posters. LOL
I guess so. But it looks futuristic and cool. Haha
This is why you are one of my favorite posters. LOL
I think I probably could have phrased it better. SW is itself a pretty broad IP, which is why we are seeing a whole new planet as the center of SW Land. I think SW is more about atmosphere and a particular feel more than any particular place in its universe (unlike, I would argue, Harry Potter), which makes it a good fit in DL. As @phruby noted, it can be seen as an extension of Fantasyland, but also can be seen as a good complement to Frontierland, as the OT (especially ANH), is undeniably influenced by old Westerns. SW was even originally conceived as a modern version of 1930's adventure serials, which links well with Adventureland. And of course a heavy dose of Sci-Fi, which is certainly present in Tommorowland. My point is, SW itself is an amalgamation of different story types, many of which are present in the themed lands of Disneyland. I can't fault you if you can't accept the idea of a single IP land in DL, since it is a radical deviation of the original park concept, but SWL, IMO, is not a radical deviation from the overall tone of the park.?????
This is a contradiction.
I think I probably could have phrased it better. SW is itself a pretty broad IP, which is why we are seeing a whole new planet as the center of SW Land. I think SW is more about atmosphere and a particular feel more than any particular place in its universe (unlike, I would argue, Harry Potter), which, makes it a good fit in DL. As @phruby noted, it can be seen as an extension of Fantasyland, but also can be seen as a good complement to Frontierland, as the OT (especially ANH), is undeniably influenced by old Westerns. SW was even originally conceived as a modern venison of 1930's adventure serials, which links well with Adventureland. And of course a heavy dose of Sci-Fi, which is certainly present in Tommorowland. My point is, SW itself is an amalgamation of different story types, many of which present in the themed lands of Disneyland. I can't fault you if you can't accept the idea of a single IP land in DL, since it is a radical deviation of the original park concept, but SWL, IMO, is not a radical deviation from the overall tone of the park.
Fair enoughI disagree with all your points, but to each their own.
Way back when Disney was considering a complete Lucas redo of Tomorrowland, including the 2nd pedestrian level, I was all for it, but now I'm glad the Star Wars theme is more tucked away. I agree with you about the great previous progression of themes as you circle the park, but that's all out the window now and I'm trying to make lemonade out of what we're getting (I think it'll be yummy lemonade, at least). Since SW technically takes place in the distant past, you could say that when you walk past critter country you're going off the time map into uncharted territory...I guess.I was a big champion of SW taking over TL because 1) Walt's concept for the land is extremely dated and tired for audiences today, and 2) I prefer that DL's distinct thematic lands (Adventure, The American Frontier, Fantasy and the Future) be linked directly to the Hub or arranged in logical progression. To me the final placement of SW Land is awkward because it breaks the narrative as you move in a circular path from west to east and vice versa, not to mention that there will be two different disconnected future/sci-fi lands on opposite sides of the park.
In the end though the improvements to the ROA and the Frontierland segment of the DLRR will be nice and I'm confident that SW will delight and amaze DL guests for many generations.
What I do want to see brought back to Tomorrowland is brightness, kinetics and optimism. It should paint a near-future that actually looks fun to live in. I agree with mickEblu that this could be primarily accomplished with the look of the land, and not necessarily the rides. Make it a land about dreaming about tomorrow. The biggest plus would be to finally come up with a fun, workable, visually awesome Peoplemover replacement and either relocate the Orbiter or just trash it. They could keep Nemo, Buzz and (especially) Space Mt. Make Autopia look futuristic if they're going to keep it. Put a high-tech reinvention of Circlevision in the Carousel theater. Have lots of live music, fountains, brightness and--for once--really good food, all tied together with a slick, breezy architectural style that ties everything together. That would be enough for now.![]()
This would be the EZ-Fix version.I was with you up until this paragraph. I'm not opposed to those ideas, but I sure hope that Disney can come up with something more than just an update of TL '67.
tc. I think DL should stick close to its original message...
THIS.
Discovery Bay should have gone where SWL is going now. Too late now.
If Discovery Bay was installed way back around the time it was supposed to be put it in, they'd be leveling it to become SWL by now anyways.
It'd be a 30+ year old land based on old Disney IP and probably a shell of what it was in its heyday.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.