Not my idea of a vacation but...

[rt06]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/05/t...egion&WT.nav=c-column-middle-span-region&_r=0

Worst. Itinerary. Ever.

 

[rt06]

Sorry. Didn't realize this article was already posted. Please remove.

 

[The Empress Lilly]

Eh, to each their own. They did work out a pretty decent commando schedule for park novices, well done.

They did every single thrill ride in WDW in one day, throughout all parks, some twice, with plenty of time to spare. To me this shows WDW really ought to build two or three more E-level thrill rides. It is much lacking in this regard.

 

[CaptainAmerica]

Why does that article need to exist? Whose life, anywhere, is enriched in any way having read it?

 

[Flippin'Flounder]

If they had started 2 hours earlier, they would have been able to ride Star Tours, and would have had plenty of time to enjoy the MK to ride Splash Mountain and other fun rides.

 

[Dwarful]

I was thinking they lost prime ride time by arriving at the first park at 11 AM.

 

[danlb_2000]

Why does that article need to exist? Whose life, anywhere, is enriched in any way having read it?

Welcome to the internet.

 

[Matt_Black]

Why does that article need to exist? Whose life, anywhere, is enriched in any way having read it?

Yeah. Internet. I once read an article where someone made fake OKCupid profiles for the characters from Sex & The City to see who would get the most responses. To reiterate, the author thought nothing about wasting people's time for the sole benefit of writing a fluff piece about FICTIONAL CHARACTERS.

 

[The Empress Lilly]

Yeah. Internet. I once read an article where someone made fake OKCupid profiles for the characters from Sex & The City to see who would get the most responses. To reiterate, the author thought nothing about wasting people's time for the sole benefit of writing a fluff piece about FICTIONAL CHARACTERS.

Yes, it's easy to spend way too much time obsessing about fictional characters.

 

[Arthur Wellesley]

Why does that article need to exist? Whose life, anywhere, is enriched in any way having read it?

You know, that whole 1st Amendment thing, where people are allowed to freely write/share experiences such as this, whether you may be intrigued by the material or not.

Just take a deep breath. Everything will be alright.

 

[CaptainAmerica]

You know, that whole 1st Amendment thing, where people are allowed to freely write/share experiences such as this, whether you may be intrigued by the material or not.

Just take a deep breath. Everything will be alright.

I never said they shouldn't be ALLOWED to post such an article. I simply balk at the acceptance of insipidity and weep for the future of civilization.

 

[Arthur Wellesley]

I never said they shouldn't be ALLOWED to post such an article. I simply balk at the acceptance of insipidity and weep for the future of civilization.

There are far numerous reasons one should be a bit concerned about the future of civilization. But it is more than unlikely that any of those contributors to it's downfall will be an internet article stating how many E-ticket attractions you can squeeze in before brunch.

Relax. It's just an article.

 

[BrerJon]

Why does that article need to exist? Whose life, anywhere, is enriched in any way having read it?

Bob Iger's.

Anyone who thinks they won't bother with WDW as it's too big, too intimidating, and takes too many vacation days to enjoy might read that article and reconsider as it makes it all sound so easy to do so much in a day that even those on limited time can visit WDW and not miss out too much.

Of course, once they've paid their dollars and are here, they realise the reality is somewhat different, but by that time Disney has them hooked in.